User Tag List

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 74 of 74
  1. #71
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,951
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 186 Times in 126 Posts
    Romney has one parent who was born in the USA. So does Obama.

    Under the Naturalization Act of 1790, they both appear to be eligible to be POTUS.

  2. #72
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    4,324
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 675 Times in 523 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder
    Romney has one parent who was born in the USA. So does Obama.

    Under the Naturalization Act of 1790, they both appear to be eligible to be POTUS.
    Yeah. But Romney's dad makes a better tortillia, no doubt.

    And made fresh? OMG!!!
    0101011101101000011001010111011100100001

  3. #73
    Don't Drone Me Bro! Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    FEMA Region 10
    Posts
    71,577
    Thanks
    2,482
    Thanked 2,581 Times in 2,061 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder View Post
    Romney has one parent who was born in the USA. So does Obama.

    Under the Naturalization Act of 1790, they both appear to be eligible to be POTUS.
    Nope, your own link proved you wrong.
    Because Banning Propaganda “Ties the Hands of America’s Diplomatic Officials, Military, and Others by Inhibiting Our Ability to Effectively Communicate In a Credible Way”


  4. #74
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Center of the universe: So Cal
    Posts
    3,925
    Thanks
    129
    Thanked 193 Times in 160 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mordent View Post
    You sure love to slap labels on people, don't you? My only position here is that, as a constitutional requirement, proof of US birth should be required of all candidates, whether their last is is Obama or Romney.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blueneck View Post
    I was just kidding about the birther thing. Anyway, what I don't get is that if Obama's short form and long form didn't convince people, what would? And why would anyone's "proof" suffice?

    Or do you think there should be some non-partisan expert decider of these things, who studies original copies with a magnifying glass and makes a ruling.
    So it is, the entire nation, most importantly those charged with administering an election, do so trusting only on the assumption the candidates are honest about meeting the necessary criteria. That is odd to me given something so important.


 
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2