Yes or No
Please give your reasons why you voted as such.
Yes
No
Yes or No
Please give your reasons why you voted as such.
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ
Nazi racist homophobes such as the BNP and the English Defence League should neither be encouraged or tolerated.
Hello! I'm from Europe, where history comes from!
“Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps.”
The BNP is opposed to everything that makes western society good. That said, one of the most important things that makes western society good is freedom of speech and freedom of association. If we ban the BNP, we become like the BNP. We cannot abandon our principles to defeat a movement, even one as distasteful as the BNP. Especially since the BNP is a minor fringe party with no legitimate hope of ever coming to power.
There is no true opposition between liberty as such and control as such, for every liberty rests on a corresponding act of control. The true opposition is between the control that cramps the personal life and the spiritual order, and the control that is aimed at securing the external and material conditions of their free and unimpeded development. LT Hobhouse
Banning political speech is generally a bad idea. Better that your most heinous and hideous groups parade themselves in the open (rather than at night, with masks, as we do in the US).
No, in the interest of freedom of speech they should not be banned
They SHOULD however be lampooned, ridiculed, raspberried, made fun of, caricatured, mocked, derided, parodied and generally treated with the contempt their anti-social views deserve
I am against hate speech laws. Which is why I am glad the US actually values free speech. Because if you start declaring stuff hate speech and banning it by law then you open the for other things to be declared hate speech and banned. You basically give the government permission to ban any speech that speaks out against the government or military as hate speech. The best thing is not to give the government inch seeing how they will use that inch to try to take a mile.
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson
Of course they shouldn't be banned. Unfortunately for them, their views ensure their irrelevancy.
Absolutely not. We need to be able to see our fringe lunatics. Furthermore, they act as a good example of how a civilised and fair-minded people ought not to be. Let's hear more from them!![]()
Nah. What would be the point? They'd only go underground and get even more support.
They're pretty irrelevant in any case. Not much but hype...
They're not all wrong, you know. They might have a few correct stands as well....
Banning them is exactly the catalyst they would need to grow into something relevant......
Given enough time and no importance, they will remain isolated and untouchable.......
If only they had a different approach to put forward their points, they would have been heard and taken seriously......
if only...
Bookmarks