Thread: Christian Politicians Should Start Acting Christian

My Take: Christian politicians should start acting Christian
By Richard T. Hughes,

Let me be frank from the outset: A great cultural divide is ripping the heart from this nation and Christians are partly responsible.

I say that because 83% of the American people claim to be Christians. If those Christians lived as they are taught to live by the teacher they claim to follow, the American public square would be a very different kind of place.

If one reads the New Testament—the charter for the Christian religion—one can discover rather quickly what that tradition is all about.

Jesus tells his followers to tell the truth.

Jesus tells his followers to make peace.

Jesus tells his followers to turn the other cheek.

Jesus tells his followers to bless those who persecute them and pray for those who misuse them.

Jesus tells his followers to extend justice, especially to the poor and the dispossessed.

Jesus tells his followers to serve as bridge-builders and agents of reconciliation.

And Jesus tells his followers to love one another, even their enemies.

But based on their words and behavior, we may safely conclude that many of the Christians who dominate America’s public square routinely reject the teachings of Jesus, in spite of their claims to the contrary.

Sharron Angle, for example, wants to be the next U. S. Senator from Nevada. She founded a Christian school but casually announces that “the nation is arming” since “if we don’t win at the ballot box, what will be the next step?” For Angle, that next step is clear: those who oppose the current administration may “have to fight for their liberty in more Second Amendment kinds of ways.” In other words, if the ballot fails, the bullet is the next best hope.

Sarah Palin is open about her allegiance to the Christian faith, but routinely trades in sarcasm, deceptions and lies about her political opposition. During the health care debate, she repeated over and again the falsehood that “the sick, the elderly, and the disabled . . . will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide . . . whether they are worthy of health care.”

Newt Gingrich trumpets his allegiance to the Christian religion and writes about the role of the Christian faith in American history. He also knows that Barack Obama is a Christian. Yet he shamelessly denounces Obama as “secular”—a term Gingrich defines as an “outlook [that] does not acknowledge God.”

No wonder that some Tea Partiers claim—as one woman put it—that “we are losing our country; we think the Muslims are moving in and taking over; we do not believe our president is a Christian.”

Glenn Beck warned a national television audience to “look for the words ‘social justice’ or ‘economic justice’ on your church Web site. If you find it, run as fast as you can,” adding that those terms are code words for communism and nazism. Surely Beck knows that there is no theme more central to biblical faith than social and economic justice for the poor, but still he is willing to distort the Christian religion for cheap political gain.

Ann Coulter promotes herself as a representative of the Christian religion. Yet, Coulter claimed after September 11, 2001 that the United States “should invade their countries [Muslim nations], kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.”

When public figures like these so completely diminish the Christian faith, it is hardly surprising that grassroots believers often engage in similar distortions of the Christian religion.

Some Christians at anti-Obama rallies have displayed signs that proclaim, “Since 1630: Bible hugging! Gun toting! Red Blooded American Against Tyranny.” Or another: “I will keep my freedom, my Bible, my gun, and my money.”

When Christians so widely and publicly embrace such blatant distortions of the Christian religion, they abandon one of the roles they might have played in America’s public square: fostering civility and dialogue and building lasting bridges of reconciliation.

But civility and respect have been all but lost in contemporary American politics. Alan Keyes, for example, has proclaimed that “Obama is a radical communist.” And one of the signs that routinely appears at anti-Obama rallies shows the President wearing a Nazi uniform and doing a Hitler salute. Another sign reads, “Barack Hussein Obama: the New Face of Hitler.” Those kinds of accusations are nothing short of slander.

The issue I am raising has nothing to do with whether one is a Republican, a Democrat, a Tea Partier, or an independent. Neither political conservatives nor political liberals have a monopoly on this kind of behavior, though in recent months conservatives opposed to Barack Obama have been especially guilty.

Yet the issue I am raising ultimately has nothing to do with whether one likes or dislikes Barack Obama. The issue has to do with Christians behaving like Christians and thereby telling the truth, doing justice, and promoting basic respect for other human beings.

After all, since 83% of the American population identifies with the Christian religion, that 83% could make an enormous difference in the tone of American politics if those Christians actually practiced what they profess to believe. They could also make a positive difference in American politics if they held other Christians accountable when they engage in deception and slander in order to score political points.

America’s churches and their pastors therefore have a grave responsibility: to urge their members to serve the public square as peacemakers, as truth-tellers, as people devoted to justice, and as men and women who are actually willing to practice what Jesus taught. If America’s churches refuse to take up this task—which, after all, is a task that is central to the Christian calling—the consequences for our country could be dire, indeed.

My Take: Christian politicians should start acting Christian – CNN Belief Blog - CNN.com Blogs

Thoughts? Comments?

Originally Posted by ShawneeMoon

Glenn Beck warned a national television audience to “look for the words ‘social justice’ or ‘economic justice’ on your church Web site. If you find it, run as fast as you can,” adding that those terms are code words for communism and nazism.

The churches Mr. Beck are condemning are advocates for and associated with governmental wealth redistribution. This has little to do with the church performing in its traditional role, asking for donations / tithes and using that money for good works in the community - that is private charity, plain and simple.

Beck is a Mormon; to be in good standing in that faith you have to tithe a large portion of your weekly income. I'm pointing this out because a) this is a voluntarily association - no one can force you to be a member of the CoJCoLDS and b) this organization uses quite a large portion of that income it gets from all around the world for "good works" projects and charitable purposes. Clearly Mr. Beck has no issue with the church as private charitable provider...

The point is, this author horribly muddles the issue. And then he goes on to spout lies:

Surely Beck knows that there is no theme more central to biblical faith than social and economic justice for the poor, but still he is willing to distort the Christian religion for cheap political gain.

Surely Mr. Hughes knows that the Jesus figure in the Bible wasn't an establishment kind of guy, considering how the establishment harassed and eventually had him killed without justification.

Surely Mr. Hughes can understand the difference between a messiah figure being nice to others, leading by example, and encouraging other people to do the same... and the iron fist of government taking your property at the barrel of a gun to give to someone else.

Surely Mr. Hughes is distorting the Christian religion for political gain. I'm sure he can distinguish between coercion and voluntary association. I'm sure he's read the document in question, wherein a deity made a planet and a species in his own image, made them to have free will to choose to be good or evil, and later had an earthly son to serve as message and redeemer who still didn't conquer or demand or force anyone to behave a certain way...

Of course, that is ultimately the central tenet of the utopian leftist - their peers (and I say this loosely, because of the degree of looking-down-the-nose that goes on) are children who must be told what to do for the greater good, must be made to be nice to each other, can't say mean things, have to be made to give things to each other; certainly can't be encouraged or left to follow their own free will, right?

But civility and respect have been all but lost in contemporary American politics.

CONTEMPORARY? Heh. Look at the Jefferson & Adams campaigns. When were civility and respect ever present in American politics? When were civility and respect ever present in politics? Delusional.