I agree with that. I just didn't think it was fair to only pick on the Mormons when so many others are just as guilty.
The true root of this problem Bourne, this isn't bigotry as far as the Churches are concerned. When a Government starts making laws concerning a moral issue, involving a ceremony that originated with a calling to a higher power for a union, then we start to have problems.
The Government took marriage and turned it into a money making thing to regulate and tax. You even have to pay the Government for your "right" to get married int he form of a marriage license.
Sure, the Church isn't supposed to get involved with politics, but politics can get involved with the Churches?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending Churches. In order to understand the true issues involved, we have to look at the roots of what marriage is, what the Government turned it into, and why are there citizens out there looking for a religious acceptence of a religious ceremoney that is currently regulated by the Government?
If it's all that critical, why don't the gays form their own Church, which only requires 13 people and a charter, institute their own doctrine that allows Marriage between gays and just perform the ceremony and have it at that?
OH yeah, the state doesn't recognize it... but then, if we are to have a true separation of Church and State, then the Government needs to stay the hell out of it and let the people do as they will, like they should in a free society.
Now you know why Ron Paul says it needs to be delegated out of Federal regulation, and let the people excersize the 10th Amendment in the Bill of Rights. That way if California outlaws it but it's OK in say, Nevada (not sure if it is, this is just an example), then they can run to that state, get married and go home.
Moral issues should never be made into laws by the Federal Government for that very reason.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote
Bookmarks