Thread: Russia vs Zionist World.........

Originally Posted by namvet

we take it your a communists

So?
Being a communist isn't worst than being a republican, socialist, liberal, libertarian etc. That's just a political ideology, communists aren't eating babies.

PUTIN TRUMPS THE ZIONIST WEST

“A STAR SHALL RISE IN THE EAST� wrote the Russian author & visionary Fyodor Dostoyevsky in his book, Brothers Karamazov. What Dostoyevsky had in mind was the re-emergence of the Russian Orthodox Church as a “light to the world.�

Truly, the darkness of the Zionist-occupied West and its New World Order has descended upon the geopolitical scene ever since the founding of the rogue nation known as the State of Israel in 1948.

Revealing a light that is now dispelling the darkness of the Zionist-Jewish West, The Guardian’s European editor, Ian Traynor, points out in his article, Six Days That Broke One Country & Reshaped The World Order, that Vladimir Putin and his coup in Georgia has “tilted the global balance of power against the West in favour of the rising star of the East.�
To an audience that included John McCain and Robert Gates, Putin served notice to the West of his geopolitical vision in his February 2007 Munich speech:
— “What is a unipolar world? It refers to one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making. It is a world in which there is one master, one sovereign. This is pernicious … unacceptable … impossible� — Here.
On August 13, 2008, French President Nicholas Sarkozy, in his diplomatic efforts in Moscow, tacitly acknowledged that America’s “one centre of decision-making� was indeed “impossible� for the European community. Assuring Moscow that it was “normal for Russia to want to defend Russian-speaking people outside Russia’s borders,� Sarkozy let Moscow know that the European Community had its own interests at stake:
— “The EU has to be ready to defuse the situation in Georgia. But it cannot forget its own interests in the process�

READ MORE -- Putin Trumps The Zionist West | Real Jew News

Originally Posted by North Pole Resident

Russia seizes 'large arsenal' of US weapons: military spokesman


MOSCOW (AFP)--Russian forces have seized a "large arsenal" of U.S.-made weapons in the western Georgian city of Senaki including hundreds of assault rifles, a military spokesman said Friday.
"In Senaki, we seized a large arsenal of weapons including 664 U.S.-made M-16 rifles" and a number of M-40 sniper rifles, General Anatoly Nogovitsyn told a news conference in Moscow. "There were 1,728 weapons total."

Russia Seizes Arsenal Of US Weapons In Georgia - Military


Russian forces seized a "large arsenal" of US-made weapons in the western Georgian city of Senaki including hundreds of assault rifles and grenade launchers, a military spokesman said Friday.
France 24 | Russia seizes 'large arsenal' of US weapons: military spokesman | France 24


Russia seizes 'large arsenal' of US weapons: military spokesman

They can replace their Russian junk with decent US weapons.

Originally Posted by bla bla

Kalashnikov automatic rifle 1947: AK-47

A Russian made AK-47, the cheap easy to get, highly reliable,
ubiquitous tool of death.

Only to be out gunned by the AK-74..



Now thats a rifle, with a "Twist" in the Ammo.

Originally Posted by Nerv14

well actually... it would be more like a western world (including the culturally western Israel) against Russia right now... This has nothing to do with Zionism or anti-semitism.

Just stop it you are ruining everything by saying things like that. hey don't be a political queer
engage in an irrational smeer
get with it you
blame the Hebrew
sound like a lion
blame it on Zion
damn that Moses
and his collective neuroses
get with the clues
Fagan, Shylock, all Jews
they rejected pork
then seized New York
aint going to heaven
cuz they caused 9-11
control Tom Hanks
and all the banks

Originally Posted by michaelr

Only to be out gunned by the AK-74..



Now thats a rifle, with a "Twist" in the Ammo.

The above is a Felashie Jewish Zionist warrior.

Originally Posted by Kyryahn

So?
Being a communist isn't worst than being a republican, socialist, liberal, libertarian etc. That's just a political ideology, communists aren't eating babies.

Guess you have no clue what happened in Kampuchea, the Ukraine, rural China, Romania.

The original thread was simply designed to incite negative reaction. Your acting naive and trying to defend communism is charming but with due respect equally as silly.

No doubt you probably find Che Guevara and berets cute.

So why is it communists always grow up to become the nastiest of capitalist exploiters? Do tell. Could it be the need to control through institutions designed for the elite?

Wait now don't tell me, you live on a collective and share everything you own and never purchased anything from a country that exploits labourers well of course Vietnam and China that's o.k. cuz they are communist.

Originally Posted by roobarb

Guess you have no clue what happened in Kampuchea, the Ukraine, rural China, Romania.

The original thread was simply designed to incite negative reaction. Your acting naive and trying to defend communism is charming but with due respect equally as silly.

No doubt you probably find Che Guevara and berets cute.

So why is it communists always grow up to become the nastiest of capitalist exploiters? Do tell. Could it be the need to control through institutions designed for the elite?

Wait now don't tell me, you live on a collective and share everything you own and never purchased anything from a country that exploits labourers well of course Vietnam and China that's o.k. cuz they are communist.

I think the point Kyryahn was trying to make is that 'Communist' does not equal 'supporter of Russian imperialism'; as the Cold War has left the confusing impression in the minds of many Americans that it does.

Further, 'communist' does not equal 'tyrannical regimes like Cambodia and Romania'. The term is used to describe a big swathe of political opinion. The communist parties we have in Europe nowadays, many of which have changed their names, are often quite different in ideology, practice and outlook both to the Communist parties of the old Eastern Bloc, and to how their parties used to be.

Originally Posted by North Pole Resident

For more information visit: Jeff Rense Program

After seeing the picture above, I thought I may remind some realities being missed on it.

If you CLICK HERE, you may read that Stalin has said to Roosevelt, that he was a zionist, too, like him. Also THIS LINK has some proofs about the Stalin's leadership and support for zionist activities. After looking at those, you may easily recognize that one of the former Soviet leaders probably idolized by Mr.Putin was also a zionist, and, this would add some BP logos and hexagrams onto the Russian Map, and, some sticker BP logos and hexagrams to the body of the brown bear roaring there, too I think.

So, what is this war all about in Georgia? Probably a war to test who shall be the zionist chef in that area, as all of the sides having war with each other seems to be all zionists.

I can say that despite the zionist past of Russia, Muslim countries cannot ignore a profitable alliance with Russia against USA-Israeli threat, if Russians are seriously thinking of helping them without evil plans, against the slaughters Americans and Israelis have been making in Iraq and Palestine.

Muslims also must not forget the old communists' fake promises of freedom, given to the Muslim population in old Russia, against Char Kingdom. After obtaining the control in Soviet lands, 'majorly with the support of Muslim rebelions against Char Kingdom', communists started ethnically cleaning and enslaving Muslims within their boundaries, so while making alliances, such realities must not be forgotten and a full trust must not be formed to anyone who has such a past with Muslims. At least we can see that American-Israeli alliance is making Muslim slaughters at the moment and possess a much bigger threat to the Muslim world than Russia do and one-polar political visions are the most dangerous and freedom-remover political paths and multi-polar politics must be considered 'as long as it is possible' to make multi-polar alliances, as multi-polar politics are usually organized for the best profit to the nation which is on that way.

If we examine the world today, we can easily see that the most sufferer and/or enslaved nations are the ones having one-polar and blind political tendencies which are not changing for ages. Such nations are the ones to be easiestly abused and enslaved.

I also think that Russia must solve Chechnian problem, if they are to convince and ally Muslims more effectively, as the blood of Chechnian Muslims would have formed oceans, if the land was not sucking it in Checnia.

Sincerely,

Originally Posted by caffeine

I think the point Kyryahn was trying to make is that 'Communist' does not equal 'supporter of Russian imperialism'; as the Cold War has left the confusing impression in the minds of many Americans that it does.

Further, 'communist' does not equal 'tyrannical regimes like Cambodia and Romania'. The term is used to describe a big swathe of political opinion. The communist parties we have in Europe nowadays, many of which have changed their names, are often quite different in ideology, practice and outlook both to the Communist parties of the old Eastern Bloc, and to how their parties used to be.

Then if I follow your logic Kampuchea. Romania , China and the Soviet Union were not communist regimes. Sorry. I have no idea where I got that impression from. All those references to the people and Karl Marx and Lenin confused me. Sorry.

Now you say communism does not equate to someone supporting Russian imperialism. Sorry I respectfully disagree, Vladimir Putin is a KGB officer. He was trained and created by the KGB the epitome of the Soviet communist system. You want to play semantics with what the word communist means to try sanitize it be my guest. For me communist refers to state run monopolies. Your trying to flex the word to suggest if you consider a communist country bad its not communist I have problems with.

It would like me trying to argue the US is not democratic. The fact that the US has lots of internal problems does not mean suddenly it can't be called a democracy because we can only reserve that word for perfect countries.

In fact using your definition there has never been a communist or democractic country and we should refer to them all as tyranical and less tyranical.

Sorry I no bite on your carrot today. Not on this one.

The person who initiated this thread makes no qualms about being a Putin groupy and pro Russia imperialist. So let's stop beating around the Bush and get on with it. He feels the US and the West are his enemy as well as we evil Zionists.

I don't divide the world up that way. I criticize Russia as I would any other nation that violates international law. I criticize it no different then I do the West-for being an opportunist engaged in a war to protect its oil interests.

The difference is The US in my opinion gets unfairly treated as the only country in the world with an interest in protecting its oil needs and the double standard used for Israel I will not even get into.

The Americans have every right to protect their oil interests as any other nation does. They have just as much a right to support Georgia as Russia has the right to support Iran.

This double standard that when the US supports Georgia or Israel its evil but when China or Russia prop up regimes like Iran, Syria, Sudan and North Korea we simply look the other way is a crock.

I will take US imperialism over Russian or Chinese imperialism any day.

Sorry but I will not sugar coat the KGB pretending its running anything but a communist regime. Putin reinstated a state run economy that squashes and prevents any free enterprise and free markets. What we have is a typical communist state-a state run monopoly run by the Russian mob former KGB alliance.

Say what you want about the US but when its mega corporations run the economy and they do and create monopolies, at least their employees have a better standard of living when all is said and done despite all the problems we free enterprise countries have. As bad as we think we have it, we live in utopia compared to China or Russia and how their average citizen has to live.

And no I am not interested in living in Iran or Sudan either. I do not like people with beards,