Thread: US world domination-why is the world letting them get awy with it

a fourm member posted an article by top level american for world domination. This artcle is not secret but on the net freely availble for people and goverments to read. Yet there appears to be no opposiition from world goverment to the US attempt at world domination. In some cases there apears to be direct support ie the document statse the need for the US to set a global missile shield. NATO and eurpean goverments have just given the ok for this to begin in poland -regardless of major threats from russia for a new cold war
so why is there no opposiition to ths attempt by the US for world domination

from Horhey

n September 2000, a few months before the accession of George W. Bush to the White House, the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) published its blueprint for global domination under the title: "Rebuilding America's Defenses."

The PNAC's declared objective is quite simple:

"Fight and decisively win in multiple, simultaneous theater wars."

This statement indicates that the US plans to be involved simultaneously in several war theaters in different regions of the World.

The PNAC outlines a roadmap of conquest. It calls for "the direct imposition of U.S. "forward bases" throughout Central Asia and the Middle East "with a view to ensuring economic domination of the world, while strangling any potential "rival" or any viable alternative to America's vision of a 'free market' economy."

Also, according to PNAC ultimately America must:

* Reposition permanently based forces to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia
and the Middle East;
* Develop and deploy a global missile defense system, and develop a
strategic dominance of space;
* Control the "International Commons" of cyberspace;
* Increase defense spending to a minimum of 3.8 percent of gross domestic
product, up from the 3 percent currently spent.

oh jezus.
PNAC isn't about world domination, it is about spreading democracy.
just happens that democracy is more peaceful than Islam which is going for Global Domination.
AQ claimed it wanted to reclaim France and SPain last week.

the US isn't going around and forcing other countries to follow it's law or government. like Islam is!

Originally Posted by sectionOne

oh jezus.
PNAC isn't about world domination, it is about spreading democracy.
just happens that democracy is more peaceful than Islam which is going for Global Domination.
AQ claimed it wanted to reclaim France and SPain last week.

the US isn't going around and forcing other countries to follow it's law or government. like Islam is!

Oh, ya mean, it's all about the neocon agenda? Death to the neocons and spreading democracy. Kinda like Chrisitans speading Christianity. Bad news.

Originally Posted by Sgt. Bilko

Oh, ya mean, it's all about the neocon agenda? Death to the neocons and spreading democracy. Kinda like Chrisitans speading Christianity. Bad news.

HOW CAN YOU ARGUE THAT DEMOCRACY SHOULDN'T BE SPREAD?

There is no plan for World Domination by the U.S. It's just silly. We don't work that way, we never did. If we wanted world domination, why didn't we keep the territories we occupied in Europe? Why didn't we use harsher tactics during the Vietnam conflict? Why didn't we go to war with the Soviet Union? It's just silly, the actions of the United States have never been in line with world domination.

Have you read this?
Statement of Principles

Possibly the most damning sentence is "we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles." Sounds bening... The rest of the document explains almost everything about our foreign policy in the last 5 years and the agenda which had been in place since at least 1997.

- None of this would be relevant if it weren't publicly signed off on by Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney, I. Lewis Libby, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, Zalmay Khalilzad (under the current administration, former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq, and currently to the United Nations), Paula Dobriansky (Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs), Peter W. Rodman (Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs, 2001-2007); and Gary Bauer, Steve Forbes, Dan Quayle, William J. Bennett, Elliot A. Cohen, Aaron Friedberg, Francis Fukuyama, Fred Ikle, Frank Gaffney.


If the first link is too vague, then here is a letter to President Clinton in 1998:
Letter to President Clinton on Iraq



(jane, where area you from?)

Some people, quite obviously, aren't ready for it.

In the months leading up to the Iraq invasion, I discovered the PNAC website. After reading statements like the one you quoted, I knew absolutely that these people were going to invade that country, and that every and any bogus excuse would be used to justify it. That dreadful realization nearly made me vomit. It was physically revolting.

do you really think that anyone invades another coutnry to spread democracy? People in positions of power do only one thing; spread that power. If that power is spiritual, or freedom / liberty, then they work to spread that power. But its all about power, and the ability to influence society to a greater extent.

Democracy, as a justification for going to war, is for the poor and middle class. The rich do not care about democracy, because they will want to kepe the power for themselves.

However, to the post that said 'why didn't we go to war against russia'.
You are naive. A world-wide domination doesn't mean going to war. Worldwide domination means exactly that; domination of the world. Extending your influence over the world. The Russians were too strong; if we went to war, our influence in the world would have been greatly reduced. Its about extending US influnece, not making war.

Originally Posted by sectionOne

the US isn't going around and forcing other countries to follow it's law or government. like Islam is!

WHAT THE FUCK IS WITH YOU AND ISLAM?

Racist ****.

And by the way, what 'other countries' does Islam force to follow its law????


ISLAM IS A RELIGION.

USA IS A COUNTRY.


That is unbelievable how much of a dense statement that is.

Islam might make people follow its law, but show me a religion that doesn't.

ANd before anyone starts moaning about how some governments make people follow laws according to religion, i give you this sentence.

John Scopes and the Monkey Trial.

Thos who aren't complete thckwads will know what im on about.