LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksPark police can enforce camping ban, judge rules - CNN.com
Looks like a judge finally ruled what most of us already knew: camping in a public park is not a form of Constitutionally-protected free speech. It violates the rights of other citizens, and can lead to filth, disorder, and a health hazard.
Sorry, Occutards.
User Tag List
Results 1 to 10 of 36
-
4th February 2012 08:20 PM #1Senior Member Array
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 1,951
- Thanks
- 40
- Thanked 186 Times in 126 Posts
Federal judge: "camping in a park indefinitely is not protected free-speech"
-
5th February 2012 02:23 AM #2Senior Member Array
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 9,715
- Thanks
- 1,367
- Thanked 1,999 Times in 1,352 Posts
Now if our Supreme Idiots would only rule on what most of us already know:
Originally Posted by Oscar99
Park police can enforce camping ban, judge rules - CNN.com
Looks like a judge finally ruled what most of us already knew: camping in a public park is not a form of Constitutionally-protected free speech. It violates the rights of other citizens, and can lead to filth, disorder, and a health hazard.
Sorry, Occutards.
giving money to Senators is not a form of Constitutionally-protected free speech. It violates the rights of other citizens, and can lead to horrible economic crises worse than the Great Depression, debt on an intractable scale, and the squashing of vital legislation passed by overwhelming bipartisan majorities in the House.
-
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to nonsqtr For This Useful Post:
boontito (5th February 2012), Chief (5th February 2012), Cicero (5th February 2012), Devil505 (5th February 2012), HadEnough2 (9th February 2012), Inkslinger (6th February 2012), metheron (7th February 2012)
-
5th February 2012 05:46 AM #3Senior Member
Array
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Mass
- Posts
- 24,920
- Thanks
- 2,849
- Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,436 Posts
While I'm in general agreement with the Occupy movements, I agree with this court decision. Originally Posted by Oscar99
Park police can enforce camping ban, judge rules - CNN.com
Looks like a judge finally ruled what most of us already knew: camping in a public park is not a form of Constitutionally-protected free speech. It violates the rights of other citizens, and can lead to filth, disorder, and a health hazard.
Sorry, Occutards.He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire.
Winston Churchill
-
5th February 2012 05:50 AM #4Senior Member Array
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 5,991
- Thanks
- 207
- Thanked 434 Times in 347 Posts
It did lead to filth, disorder, and health hazards numbering in the thousands and that was just the protesters themselves, so I agree as well. Originally Posted by Devil505
-
5th February 2012 06:41 AM #5Unauthorized Person Array
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Virginia
- Posts
- 10,426
- Thanks
- 3,169
- Thanked 2,637 Times in 1,805 Posts
Yeah, that's what they told the vets after WWI too. Funny how only SOME people are entitled to petition their government for redress. Originally Posted by Oscar99
Park police can enforce camping ban, judge rules - CNN.com
Looks like a judge finally ruled what most of us already knew: camping in a public park is not a form of Constitutionally-protected free speech. It violates the rights of other citizens, and can lead to filth, disorder, and a health hazard.
Sorry, Occutards."after 9/11 bush was polling around 90 percent. that means the vast majority of democrats and independents put partisanship aside and threw in their lot with the country and her president, and it was only after years of bush's abject failure that this support began to erode.
i've yet to see any evidence this move is even in the republican playbook. obama's got a D on his helmet so republicans want to see him sacked. period." Highway234
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cicero For This Useful Post:
highway234 (5th February 2012), Vortex (5th February 2012)
-
5th February 2012 10:32 AM #6Senior Member Array
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Middle of nowhere Arkansas
- Posts
- 5,457
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 222 Times in 192 Posts
No reports of the ww1 vets raping women or even crapping on police cars. Originally Posted by Cicero
Maxine Waters told me to go to straight to hell. Doesn't anyone listen to Obama anymore?
-
5th February 2012 01:28 PM #7Unauthorized Person Array
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Virginia
- Posts
- 10,426
- Thanks
- 3,169
- Thanked 2,637 Times in 1,805 Posts
No real organized attempt to smear them either... Originally Posted by Dutch
"after 9/11 bush was polling around 90 percent. that means the vast majority of democrats and independents put partisanship aside and threw in their lot with the country and her president, and it was only after years of bush's abject failure that this support began to erode.
i've yet to see any evidence this move is even in the republican playbook. obama's got a D on his helmet so republicans want to see him sacked. period." Highway234
-
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cicero For This Useful Post:
boontito (5th February 2012), Chief (5th February 2012), Devil505 (5th February 2012), TennesseeRain (6th February 2012), Vortex (5th February 2012)
-
5th February 2012 02:31 PM #8Senior Member
Array
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 13,112
- Thanks
- 685
- Thanked 1,643 Times in 1,178 Posts
True. I'm wondering if the whole 'disease and filth' meme isn't overblown. There were contraindications of this problem that were under reported in the press. Maybe we'll get a Poli Sci or media analysis of this in a couple of years. Originally Posted by Cicero
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...#ixzz1mzxuiVUmEven when alternative views are clearly wrong, being exposed to them still expands our creative potential. In a way, the power of dissent is the power of surprise. After hearing someone shout out an errant answer, we work to understand it, which causes us to reassess our initial assumptions and try out new perspectives. “Authentic dissent can be difficult, but it’s always invigorating,” Nemeth says.
-
5th February 2012 08:21 PM #9Senior Member Array
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 5,991
- Thanks
- 207
- Thanked 434 Times in 347 Posts
That's not what the Court decided, please do your homework. Originally Posted by nonsqtr
-
6th February 2012 01:26 AM #10Senior Member Array
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 4,235
- Thanks
- 239
- Thanked 544 Times in 453 Posts
The court decided, correctly, that people do not surrender their First Amendment freedoms just because they own stock in a company. Originally Posted by Blackbeard
What idiots ever thought they did?They wielded a invincible weapon. A small wooden plaque bearing the letters F.T.I.W.
ITSO - Ignoramus That Supports Obama.
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Bookmarks