User Tag List

Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 109
  1. #1
    ... Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    20,157
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 843 Times in 658 Posts

    Proposed Social Security Fix

    Increase the retirement age to 70 for people who have at least 20 years until retirement, plus tie cost-of-living increases to wages rather than the consumer price index, and limit payments so they only go to people who need them. The current Social Security "normal retirement age" for those born in 1960 or later is 67.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    931
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    You'd be recalled in a day.

  3. #3
    ... Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    20,157
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 843 Times in 658 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by YankeeSpirit View Post
    You'd be recalled in a day.
    Whats wrong with it?

  4. #4
    Master political analyst Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    The formerly great golden state
    Posts
    4,014
    Thanks
    245
    Thanked 450 Times in 297 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by USA 1 View Post
    Increase the retirement age to 70 for people who have at least 20 years until retirement, plus tie cost-of-living increases to wages rather than the consumer price index, and limit payments so they only go to people who need them. The current Social Security "normal retirement age" for those born in 1960 or later is 67.
    Add to that, take the SS funds out of the general fund, place any excess in a diversified stock/bond portfolio run by private enterprise, not the government. Initiate a reasonable timetable for paying back the IOUs issued over the years. Quit handing out SS funds as welfare payments to people who didn't earn them. Make SS a real retirement program.

    After a few years, it should be possible to reduce the retirement age, and increase the payment without bankrupting the system.

    Of course, to do all of that, we would need to have a functional federal government.
    First, asset forfeiture, then detention without trial, what's next? Suspension of elections?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    912
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    good idea; too leftist for the US, though.

  6. #6
    Master political analyst Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    The formerly great golden state
    Posts
    4,014
    Thanks
    245
    Thanked 450 Times in 297 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sinopec View Post
    good idea; too leftist for the US, though.
    I'm not sure how taking SS out of the general fund and having a private entity to invest the money is leftist. Seems to me like an idea conservatives would come up with.

    It was LBJ and his "great society" spending that made it necessary to ste... I mean borrow from the fund to begin with.
    First, asset forfeiture, then detention without trial, what's next? Suspension of elections?

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Pueblo, Colorado
    Posts
    4,383
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by USA 1 View Post
    Increase the retirement age to 70 for people who have at least 20 years until retirement, plus tie cost-of-living increases to wages rather than the consumer price index, and limit payments so they only go to people who need them. The current Social Security "normal retirement age" for those born in 1960 or later is 67.
    Sorry buddy but the AARP would hunt you down with torches within 24 hours of making that claim.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    912
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not View Post
    I'm not sure how taking SS out of the general fund and having a private entity to invest the money is leftist. Seems to me like an idea conservatives would come up with.

    It was LBJ and his "great society" spending that made it necessary to ste... I mean borrow from the fund to begin with.
    I meant the OP. Your ideas are, in all reality, stupid. A private entity to invest government money that millions would depend on for retirement? Beyond stupid.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,517
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    So it is "government money" that I am paying in every pay period? That is quite frankly ridiculous in the extreme.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sinopec View Post
    I meant the OP. Your ideas are, in all reality, stupid. A private entity to invest government money that millions would depend on for retirement? Beyond stupid.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    912
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BoogyMan View Post
    So it is "government money" that I am paying in every pay period? That is quite frankly ridiculous in the extreme.
    yeah, it is. Like a payroll tax.


 
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Social Security Reform
    By Traveling Bandsman in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 26th February 2009, 02:20 PM
  2. hot to fix Social Security and Medicare
    By nonsqtr in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 8th January 2008, 01:23 AM
  3. Social Security for some but none for you!
    By michaelr in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 9th January 2007, 01:43 PM
  4. Should Homemakers get Social Security
    By Mrs Behavin in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 26th October 2005, 01:08 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2