Thread: Nuclear war

Should tactical nuclear weapons be used in the ME ?

As a matter of cost-benefit analysis, using nuclear weapons would have been far more efficient than conventional forces in the ME.

That said, we shouldn't have been pandering around in the ME to begin with. It's just that taxpayers shouldn't be obligated to spend more than needed to complete an objective, particularly when nontaxpayers are being engaged and accommodated.

Nationbuilding is stupid. 'nuf said.

I'm sure we'd be an even bigger hit with the rest of the world than we are right now if we used nukes.

Well, the reason I ask is that our military is planning just that and they have them in theater now. I can tell by the response that it must be ok if that is what they intend to do. It is my opinion that they will use them in Syria first then Iran. I do know that they intend on using them.I suppose the only question that remains is who gets hit first and will it lead to world war.

Originally Posted by anonnymous

Should tactical nuclear weapons be used in the ME ?

Can the above question be more vague? The only information not hidden is Windows Millenial Edition and tactical nukes.

sure use the nukes and get the show on the road... I love the smell of fire and brimsone with my morning coffee

can you say armageddon??

Originally Posted by nonsqtr

Hm. They won't go after Syri* or Iran. That would be entirely nuts.

yeah non.. I find that kinda strange.. two of isreals worst enemies and isreal is supposed to be our ally .. yet syria and iran can threaten isreal and our government says nothing.. what is up with that???

The whole idea is sick but then we don't make the decisions. Just don't be surprised when they do for that is what they are planning.