User Tag List

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 71
  1. #1
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,589
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked 456 Times in 325 Posts

    Fox News Chief Roger Ailes Thinks Sarah Palin Is 'Stupid'

    Fox News Chief Roger Ailes Thinks Sarah Palin Is 'Stupid': New York Magazine

    NEW YORK -- Fox News still dominates the cable news ratings, but chairman Roger Ailes wants something more: to help elect the next president.

    That's the takeaway from Gabriel Sherman's New York magazine cover story hitting newsstands Monday. Sherman, who's currently writing a book on Fox News for Random House, looks at how Ailes -- who built up a stable of possible presidential contenders after the 2008 election, including Sarah Palin -- isn't so pleased with their chances at beating President Barack Obama in 2012.

    Ailes doesn't speak on the record in the article, but several Republicans close to the Fox News chief describe his concerns going into an election year.

    "He thinks things are going in a bad direction," another Republican close to Ailes told [Sherman]. "Roger is worried about the future of the country. He thinks the election of Obama is a disaster. He thinks Palin is an idiot. He thinks she's stupid. He helped boost her up. People like Sarah Palin haven't elevated the conservative movement."
    The Republicans were unable to produce a credible candidate in 2008, and the direct result of that failure was the election of Barack Obama. In the aftermath of that disaster, the party has promoted a variety of hacks, wannabees, and demagogues, but still has not come up with an effetive leader. The withdrawal, this weekend, of Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels from the race simply emphasizes the dearth of reasonable and responsible people on whom the Republican Party can depend. Instead, we are treated to a circus, with Mama Grizzlies, multiply-bankrupt real estate developers, has-been ex-governors, senators, and congressmen, and a walking Brylcream advertisement.

    The Republicans must be afraid of responsibility, because they seem to be doing everything they can to assure the re-election of Barack Obama.
    Account Closed

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheHighForester For This Useful Post:

    Davocrat (28th May 2011), Devil505 (24th May 2011)

  3. #2
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    east coast
    Posts
    5,110
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 842 Times in 642 Posts
    You just now, came up with that conclusion? Hell, they have been afraid of responsibility for the last 13 yrs. It's even worse now, that the Tea Party has infiltrated. Obama will get his next four years, let's hope that they will be better. I will continue to support him, considering any of the alternatives

  4. #3
    In the Human Network.. Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    3,875
    Thanks
    1,422
    Thanked 866 Times in 598 Posts
    Obama could easily be elected to a 3rd term if we let him..
    "Cowardice asks the question 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it
    Politic?' Vanity asks the question 'Is it popular?' But, conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but one must take it because one's conscience tells one that it is right."


    Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

  5. #4
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,589
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked 456 Times in 325 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Babylon View Post
    Obama could easily be elected to a 3rd term if we let him..
    By the time the Republicans get through sorting the alternatives, Obama will look good to a lot of people.
    Account Closed

  6. #5
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    2,497
    Thanks
    191
    Thanked 581 Times in 430 Posts
    The only reason the Republican Party seems not to have a credible candidate is because they (the neoconservative right and their foot soldiers at Fox News) cannibalize their own libertarian-leaning contenders that actually pull together support from social liberals and fiscal conservatives. And people eat it right up. We've all been trained to disregard libertarian thinkers as "kooky" and "loony" and "not serious," but we have no justification for doing this, other than that we're just programmed that way by our news outlets. The Power Elite cannot control libertarians, so they smear them. Effectively and efficiently. Even overtly. We all call for better commitment to the principles (not being the world's police, not overspending, heeding the Constitution) for which libertarians have always stood, but we react to them as though they are psychotic right after they repeat, almost verbatim, that which we just called for Congress and government to do better.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Neomalthusian For This Useful Post:

    bluesman (26th May 2011), Daktoria (22nd May 2011)

  8. #6
    Senior Member Chopper Challenge Champion BombJack Arcade Champion Bubbels Champion Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,895
    Thanks
    218
    Thanked 125 Times in 99 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Neomalthusian View Post
    The only reason the Republican Party seems not to have a credible candidate is because they (the neoconservative right and their foot soldiers at Fox News) cannibalize their own libertarian-leaning contenders that actually pull together support from social liberals and fiscal conservatives. And people eat it right up. We've all been trained to disregard libertarian thinkers as "kooky" and "loony" and "not serious," but we have no justification for doing this, other than that we're just programmed that way by our news outlets. The Power Elite cannot control libertarians, so they smear them. Effectively and efficiently. Even overtly. We all call for better commitment to the principles (not being the world's police, not overspending, heeding the Constitution) for which libertarians have always stood, but we react to them as though they are psychotic right after they repeat, almost verbatim, that which we just called for Congress and government to do better.
    Yea, I have to say that Forester's conclusion seems a bit off.

    The article itself even lists not so neoconservative yet still feasible candidates, and it explains how they don't want to step up because the party is just so damn dumb and prejudiced. You have these Rockefeller Republicans instead who are moderates, but they're moderate in the wrong way. They're socially conservative and fiscally liberal unless it's for bailing out big business or standing up for minorities along with aggressive foreign policy.
    Hindsight may be 20-20 but you can't "see" the future.
    As a patriot, I respect you not because you're an American, not because you're a human being, nor because you're an Earthling. I respect you because you're a person.

    Why People Are Irrational about Politics
    Political Personality Types
    National Humanities Institute - A Populist, Distributist, Paleoconservative Journal (not that I agree with it, but it's refreshing)
    Prolegomena - Cliffnotes to Kant's CPR

  9. #7
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    the state of confusion
    Posts
    5,471
    Thanks
    1,835
    Thanked 791 Times in 645 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TheHighForester View Post
    Fox News Chief Roger Ailes Thinks Sarah Palin Is 'Stupid': New York Magazine



    The Republicans were unable to produce a credible candidate in 2008, and the direct result of that failure was the election of Barack Obama. In the aftermath of that disaster, the party has promoted a variety of hacks, wannabees, and demagogues, but still has not come up with an effetive leader. The withdrawal, this weekend, of Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels from the race simply emphasizes the dearth of reasonable and responsible people on whom the Republican Party can depend. Instead, we are treated to a circus, with Mama Grizzlies, multiply-bankrupt real estate developers, has-been ex-governors, senators, and congressmen, and a walking Brylcream advertisement.

    The Republicans must be afraid of responsibility, because they seem to be doing everything they can to assure the re-election of Barack Obama.

    The Op title says that Roger Ailes "thinks" Palin is stupid .. yet it also states in the article that Ailes does not go on record about it..

    from that part of it I gather this is just a hit piece and warrants no further consideration.


    from the article quoted:

    Ailes doesn't speak on the record in the article, but several Republicans close to the Fox News chief describe his concerns going into an election year.


    My conception of this would be if Ailes actually thought this , why does he have her on the FOX payroll?
    Because whenever unlimited power and self righteous compassion are united, you end up with a bunch of self righteous pricks spending other people's money and patting themselves on the back for being compassionate.

    KMiller


    never approach a bull from the front, A horse from behind, or a fool from any direction


  10. #8
    Rigid Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Richmond Va
    Posts
    67,640
    Thanks
    3,728
    Thanked 3,109 Times in 2,156 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wingrider View Post
    My conception of this would be if Ailes actually thought this , why does he have her on the FOX payroll?
    Foxs' entire staffing is comprised of stupidity. Just sayin.
    Waterboarding Republitards since 2005...

  11. #9
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    the state of confusion
    Posts
    5,471
    Thanks
    1,835
    Thanked 791 Times in 645 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Inkslinger View Post
    Foxs' entire staffing is comprised of stupidity. Just sayin.
    really??

    Bill oriely, neil cavuto, bret baer, bill hemmer, all of them are stupid ?? if these people were as stupid as you claim how did they ever succeed in the business?
    Because whenever unlimited power and self righteous compassion are united, you end up with a bunch of self righteous pricks spending other people's money and patting themselves on the back for being compassionate.

    KMiller


    never approach a bull from the front, A horse from behind, or a fool from any direction


  12. #10
    Rigid Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Richmond Va
    Posts
    67,640
    Thanks
    3,728
    Thanked 3,109 Times in 2,156 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wingrider View Post
    really??

    Bill oriely, neil cavuto, bret baer, bill hemmer, all of them are stupid ?? if these people were as stupid as you claim how did they ever succeed in the business?
    That's a no brainer... of course you'd have to have a functional brain to see it.
    They appease the ignorant, much like evangelists in the pulpit.
    Waterboarding Republitards since 2005...

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Inkslinger For This Useful Post:

    Dr Sampson Simpson (24th May 2011)


 
Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Clinical Proof - Sarah Palin is incurably stupid.
    By bonncaruso in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 7th June 2011, 04:16 AM
  2. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 25th February 2011, 03:15 PM
  3. Replies: 39
    Last Post: 19th July 2010, 11:29 PM
  4. Sarah Palin signs on as Fox News Contributer
    By U.S. Army Retired in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 11th January 2010, 07:01 PM
  5. News flash! Sarah Palin is not an idiot!
    By Think for myself in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30th September 2008, 09:45 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2