Thread: US doesn’t need outsourced jobs: Obama

US doesn’t need outsourced jobs: Obama


I think Obama took an oath to destroy whats left of this country. His reasoning for not bringing back jobs is, the jobs are low paying. Well that was the result from outsourcing them, not the market. Me thinks he needs to lay off the stupid pills, he has enough,.......quit frankly, I think this country has had enough of him!!!

yeah man I think you are right .

I seen the town hall meeting where a woman ask him about jobs being outsourced, man that was funny.. I guess his teleprompter didn't gave the right asnswer for him cause he stammered and ahemed and evadeded the question.. he is a freaking idiot and needs to be impeached for violating the trust he was given by the people..

Originally Posted by michaelr

US doesn’t need outsourced jobs: Obama


I think Obama took an oath to destroy whats left of this country. His reasoning for not bringing back jobs is, the jobs are low paying. Well that was the result from outsourcing them, not the market. Me thinks he needs to lay off the stupid pills, he has enough,.......quit frankly, I think this country has had enough of him!!!

Oath to destroy, stupid pills, etc............ It appears you think he is 100% incorrect. Fair enough.

Then what is the answer to bring all these jobs back?

btw - why do you think outsourcing has nothing to do with the market?

Originally Posted by International Underwriter

Oath to destroy, stupid pills, etc............ It appears you think he is 100% incorrect. Fair enough.

Then what is the answer to bring all these jobs back?

btw - why do you think outsourcing has nothing to do with the market?

To bring back the jobs is essential to repairing the economy. It would be a bit painful at first, but would improve life and living standards in this country. To accomplish this I would levee a non-passable tax, say 100% of the retail cost of the products.


Free market did not cause outsourcing, if you do not know that, then there is little we can talk about. Free trade, and that is a cute term for shafting our economy for the greater good of the planet, is the cause. The problem with free trade, is simple, it is over regulated and simply does not work, look around, the entire worlds economy is FAILING!

Originally Posted by michaelr

To bring back the jobs is essential to repairing the economy. It would be a bit painful at first, but would improve life and living standards in this country. To accomplish this I would levee a non-passable tax, say 100% of the retail cost of the products.

LOL..... a free marketer's answer is tariffs and regulation. I'll agree bringing back jobs is important, but that was not the free market is always efficient type response I expected.

btw - non-passable is virtually impossible to ensure. Can you imagine the amount of government oversight it would take to enforce such a clause?

Originally Posted by michaelr

Free market did not cause outsourcing, if you do not know that, then there is little we can talk about. Free trade, and that is a cute term for shafting our economy for the greater good of the planet, is the cause. The problem with free trade, is simple, it is over regulated and simply does not work, look around, the entire worlds economy is FAILING!

So you are saying it is anti free market to attempt to lower ones acquisition, construction, production, maufacturing, etc......costs?

Actually, I'll save time and agree we have little to talk about. if your free market is bounded only in the US, then its not really a free market. Is it? And if it based on the theory that human behavior ensures market efficiences then it ignores all of to date human behavioral history.

Originally Posted by International Underwriter

LOL..... a free marketer's answer is tariffs and regulation. I'll agree bringing back jobs is important, but that was not the free market is always efficient type response I expected.

btw - non-passable is virtually impossible to ensure. Can you imagine the amount of government oversight it would take to enforce such a clause?



So you are saying it is anti free market to attempt to lower ones acquisition, construction, production, maufacturing, etc......costs?

Actually, I'll save time and agree we have little to talk about. if your free market is bounded only in the US, then its not really a free market. Is it? And if it based on the theory that human behavior ensures market efficiences then it ignores all of to date human behavioral history.

Good god....

Look, we used to be the worlds leading manufacturer, inventors and what ever. This country has listened to people like you talk about human development, and the free market. The free market is fine and dandy, but it has been decades since it was practiced. Your type links free trade to free market, that is so far out there that it is hard to even consider how the two can possibly be linked.

I will tell you this, without good jobs, the forget about mending the economy. A service economy is destined for failure. Want to let the free market work, then get the government out of the way.

Originally Posted by michaelr

Good god.....

there is no god........or at least not what the brainwashed around here say it could be.

Originally Posted by michaelr

Look, we used to be the worlds leading manufacturer, inventors and what ever. This country has listened to people like you talk about human development, and the free market. The free market is fine and dandy, but it has been decades since it was practiced. Your type links free trade to free market, that is so far out there that it is hard to even consider how the two can possibly be linked.

People like me talk? My type? You have no idea what I think about the markets, trade, etc............ Just because every so often I come here to ridicule the absurd market is always efficient crap that is somehow passed around this board as anything but fantasyland, doesn't mean I support status quo.

Originally Posted by michaelr

I will tell you this, without good jobs, the forget about mending the economy. A service economy is destined for failure. Want to let the free market work, then get the government out of the way.

Yes, without the government we would have fantasyland where companies would never employ overseas workers or do anything to gain competitive advantage. They would eschew short term profit and personal compensation to do what is best for the country in the long term. No bernie madoffs, no rewriting or backdating of stock options, etc....... in fantasyland. all real evidence evidence to the contrary.

This is good for Obama. We need to understand that this is a GLOBAL economic problem and it is unlikely that any single country will get out of this alone.

Any better conditions in one country will effect us either directly or indirectly.

And on top of that, we need to give jobs to poor people around the world. Its welfare but with the free market.

Originally Posted by International Underwriter

there is no god........or at least not what the brainwashed around here say it could be.



People like me talk? My type? You have no idea what I think about the markets, trade, etc............ Just because every so often I come here to ridicule the absurd market is always efficient crap that is somehow passed around this board as anything but fantasyland, doesn't mean I support status quo.



Yes, without the government we would have fantasyland where companies would never employ overseas workers or do anything to gain competitive advantage. They would eschew short term profit and personal compensation to do what is best for the country in the long term. No bernie madoffs, no rewriting or backdating of stock options, etc....... in fantasyland. all real evidence evidence to the contrary.

Best for the country in the long term, have you completely lost all reason? Have you not looked around? Your talking apples to oranges, free trade sucked the jobs out of this country, then Bush's tax cuts finished it off. I guess you laid your bet on Obama, and you will defend this insanity no matter what, after all NAFTA was a Clinton fuck up. It did not start there however, it started back with Reagan and what was deemed as "preferred trading status", this has been around a long time. Well now the economy in this country will resemble that of Mexico, extreme unemployment, crime, and everything that goes with it, but hey, we don't need to produce, we have a socialist dictator with a fascist agenda at the helm.

Nah we didn't need those jobs anyway. We will all be in the "energy" industry and everyone will be Homer Simpson. Now for the service industry I think the immigrants directly south have taken a large chunk of those. It is a massive yard sale as we dismantle our economy for pennies on the inflated dollar. If Obama is not doing this on purpose he is a moron.Bush looks like a SR MENSA Official compared to Obama.Well at least Obama looks and sounds good.