Will Bush’s midnight rules be reversible?
Like I have said before, I have never been an ardent Bush supporter. While I still don't believe he has explicitely violated the constitution, this is fairly rediculous.Whether it’s relaxing pollution control standards for power plants or allowing loaded weapons into national parks, the Bush Administration is scrambling to approve or change as many federal rules as it can before it hands off power to President-elect Barack Obama.
While this is everybit constitutional, a level of professional discression is in order. Once a presidents time is up, it's up. This sort of cinderella policizing (I wonder how many words I can invent) seems to me to be the steriotype, cliche methode a president uses to overextend their authority and personal agenda.“The problem with what the Bush administration is doing is that these rules are extremely cumbersome to adopt, and they are every bit as cumbersome to undo,” said David Vladeck, an administrative law professor at Georgetown University. “It condemns the next administration to spend years fighting on the old administration’s agenda.”
So it looks like this will be the Bush legacy, a sledgepot of potentially crooked and ultra-partisan rules and Executive Orders. Maybe I'll try and be optimistic tonight and think that they'll all be benefical and wise. I kinda doubt it.To make sure the Bush administration’s rules would survive, White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten wrote a memo in May urging agency heads to publish all final rules in the federal register by November 1, so they would be in effect when the next administration took office. Despite Bolton’s prodding, however, many regulations are still under review at OMB and still more are being submitted.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks