Thread: Obama team reviewing 'virtually every agency'

Here are but a few PDD's, pick and chose what one should go. Read them carefully and consider yourself the victim of each. That is what it comes down to!

National Security Presidential Directives [NSPD] George W. Bush Administration

Originally Posted by michaelr

Really, I think Buffet likes free money, he was offered a half billion worth of AIG at a discount, now he has a say in how much those stocks will rise. Do you not know this or are you just protecting your vote?

Why was Buffet offered AIG at a discount? By what reckoning do you determine that it was at a discount? Did you evaluate the company and determine what the real value of its shares were? What was Warren Buffet expected to deliver for his part in the deal? Do you not know all of this or do you just find it to be more fun to randomly throw out the worst possible spin on absolutely everything you can find all the time every day?

Originally Posted by splansing

Why was Buffet offered AIG at a discount? By what reckoning do you determine that it was at a discount? Did you evaluate the company and determine what the real value of its shares were? What was Warren Buffet expected to deliver for his part in the deal? Do you not know all of this or do you just find it to be more fun to randomly throw out the worst possible spin on absolutely everything you can find all the time every day?

You need to get your head out of the sand once in a while..

AIG, based in New York, said late Tuesday it signed a definitive agreement to borrow up to $85 billion from the U.S. Federal Reserve, the central part of a rescue that calls for the government to take a 79.9 percent stake.
here..............

Stocks: Buy 'em like Buffett, what the pros are saying about Thursday's meltdown & retirement wreckers - Today in Money 9/5

I can go on. The thing to remember, this is like Cheney's stocks and money made from no bid contracts, thats probably ok now that Obama's team is doing it.

Do you just post random links to stuff when you are trying to support your points? Link #1 mentions that Buffet had an interest in purchasing some portion of AIG, but that the deal didn't get done.

The second link has a whole slew of blogger entries, none of which clarified for me what you said earlier.

So please, do go on. But try posting something that actually has something to do with what you're saying. It makes following up your links so much more interesting.