Thread: It Is Now Absolutely Crystal Clear That Republican Rule Is Dangerous & Authoritarian

By John Dean, FindLaw.com
Posted on November 1, 2008, Printed on November 2, 2008
It Is Now Absolutely Crystal Clear That Republican Rule Is Dangerous and Authoritarian | | AlterNet


Republicans rule, rather than govern, when they are in power by imposing their authoritarian conservative philosophy on everyone, as their answer for everything. This works for them because their interest is in power, and in what it can do for those who think as they do. Ruling, of course, must be distinguished from governing, which is a more nuanced process that entails give-and-take and the kind of compromises that are often necessary to find a consensus and solutions that will best serve the interests of all Americans.

Republicans' authoritarian rule can also be characterized by its striking incivility and intolerance toward those who do not view the world as Republicans do. Their insufferable attitude is not dangerous in itself, but it is employed to accomplish what they want, which it to take care of themselves and those who work to keep them in power.

Authoritarian conservatives are primarily anti-government, except where they believe the government can be useful to impose moral or social order (for example, with respect to matters like abortion, prayer in schools, or prohibiting sexually-explicit information from public view). Similarly, Republicans' limited-government attitude does not apply regarding national security, where they feel there can never be too much government activity - nor are the rights and liberties of individuals respected when national security is involved.

Authoritarian Republicans do oppose the government interfering with markets and the economy, however -- and generally oppose the government's doing anything to help anyone they feel should be able to help themselves.
In my book Broken Government: How Republican Rule Destroyed the Legislative, Executive and Judicial Branches, I set forth the facts regarding the consequences of the Republicans' controlling government for too many years. No Republican -- nor anyone else, for that matter -- has refuted these facts, and for good reason: They are irrefutable.

The McCain/Palin Ticket Perfectly Fits the Authoritarian Conservative Mold
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Senator John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican candidates, have shown themselves to be unapologetic and archetypical authoritarian conservatives. Indeed, their campaign has warmed the hearts of fellow authoritarians, who applaud them for their negativity, nastiness, and dishonest ploys and only criticize them for not offering more of the same.

The McCain/Palin campaign has assumed a typical authoritarian posture: The candidates provide no true, specific proposals to address America's needs. Rather, they simply ask voters to "trust us" and suggest that their opponents - Senators Barack Obama and Joe Biden - are not "real Americans" like McCain, Palin, and the voters they are seeking to court. Accordingly, McCain and Plain have called Obama "a socialist," "a redistributionist," "a Marxist," and "a communist" - without a shred of evidence to support their name-calling, for these terms are pejorative, rather than in any manner descriptive.

This is the way authoritarian leaders operate.

In my book Conservatives Without Conscience, I set forth the traits of authoritarian leaders and followers, which have been distilled from a half-century of empirical research, during which thousands of people have voluntarily been interviewed by social scientists. The touch points in these somewhat-overlapping lists of character traits provide a clear picture of the characters of both John McCain and Sarah Palin.
McCain, especially, fits perfectly as an authoritarian leader. Such leaders possess most,

if not all, of these traits:
* dominating
* opposes equality
* desirous of personal power
* amoral
* intimidating and bullying
* faintly hedonistic
* vengeful
* pitiless
* exploitive
* manipulative
* dishonest
* cheats to win
* highly prejudiced (racist, sexist, homophobic)
* mean-spirited
* militant
* nationalistic
* tells others what they want to hear
* takes advantage of "suckers"
* specializes in creating false images to sell self
* may or may not be religious
* usually politically and economically conservative/Republican

Incidentally, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney also can be described by these well-defined and typical traits -- which is why a McCain presidency is so likely to be nearly identical to a Bush presidency.
Clearly, Sarah Palin also has some qualities typical of authoritarian leaders, not to mention almost all of the traits found among authoritarian followers. Specifically, such followers can be described as follows:

* submissive to authority
* aggressive on behalf of authority
* highly conventional in their behavior
* highly religious
* possessing moderate to little education
* trusting of untrustworthy authorities
* prejudiced (particularly against homosexuals and followers of religions other than their own)
* mean-spirited
* narrow-minded
* intolerant
* bullying
* zealous
* dogmatic
* uncritical toward chosen authority
* hypocritical
* inconsistent and contradictory
* prone to panic easily
* highly self-righteous
* moralistic
* strict disciplinarians
* severely punitive
* demanding loyalty and returning it
* possessing little self-awareness
* usually politically and economically conservative/Republican

The leading authority on right-wing authoritarianism, a man who devoted his career to developing hard empirical data about these people and their beliefs, is Robert Altemeyer. Altemeyer, a social scientist based in Canada, flushed out these typical character traits in decades of testing.

Altemeyer believes about 25 percent of the adult population in the United States is solidly authoritarian (with that group mostly composed of followers, and a small percentage of potential leaders). It is in these ranks of some 70 million that we find the core of the McCain/Palin supporters. They are people who are, in Altemeyer's words, are "so self-righteous, so ill-informed, and so dogmatic that nothing you can say or do will change their minds."

The Problem with Electing Authoritarian Conservatives
What is wrong with being an authoritarian conservative? Well, if you want to take the country where they do, nothing. "They would march America into a dictatorship and probably feel that things had improved as a result," Altemeyer told me. "The problem is that these authoritarian followers are much more active than the rest of the country. They have the mentality of 'old-time religion' on a crusade, and they generously give money, time and effort to the cause.

They proselytize; they lick stamps; they put pressure on loved ones; and they revel in being loyal to a cohesive group of like thinkers. And they are so submissive to their leaders that they will believe and do virtually anything they are told. They are not going to let up and they are not going to go away."

I would nominate McCain's "Joe the Plumber" as a new poster-boy of the authoritarian followers. He is a believer, and he has signed on. On November 4, 2008, we will learn how many more Americans will join the ranks of the authoritarians.

Frankly, the fact that the pre-election polls are close - after eight years of authoritarian leadership from Bush and Cheney, and given its disastrous results -- shows that many Americans either do not realize where a McCain/Palin presidency might take us, or they are happy to go there. Frankly, it scares the hell out of me, for there is only one way to deal with these conservative zealots: Keep them out of power.

This election should be a slam dunk for Barack Obama, who has run a masterful campaign. It was no small undertaking winning the nomination from Hillary Clinton, and in doing so, he has shown without any doubt (in my mind anyway) that he is not only qualified to be president, but that he might be a once-in-a-lifetime leader who can forever change the nation and the world for the better.

If Obama is rejected on November 4th for another authoritarian conservative like McCain, I must ask if Americans are sufficiently intelligent to competently govern themselves. I can understand authoritarian conservatives voting for McCain, for they know no better. It is well-understood that most everyone votes with his or her heart, not his or her head. Polls show that 81 percent of Americans "feel" (in their hearts and their heads) that our country is going the wrong way. How could anyone with such thoughts and feelings vote for more authoritarian conservatism, which has done so much to take the nation in the wrong direction?

We will all find out on (or about) November 5th.

What a crock.

If the Republicans were authoritarian, there would be a lot of comedians and satirists in jail. I can't wait to see if Obama is as tolerant of criticism and mockery as Bush has been. I wonder what Obama will do if somebody make a movie about his assassination or mocks his children or makes fun of his wife?

Originally Posted by kmiller1610

What a crock.

If the Republicans were authoritarian, there would be a lot of comedians and satirists in jail. I can't wait to see if Obama is as tolerant of criticism and mockery as Bush has been. I wonder what Obama will do if somebody make a movie about his assassination or mocks his children or makes fun of his wife?

Wanna talk about Gitmo prisoners?

Totaly and exactly right on target...the righties should be showing up soon with flowers and a big bottle of 73 vintage denial.

I will wait...they will comeopcorn::hissy:opcorn::girlfight:

Originally Posted by kmiller1610

What a crock.

If the Republicans were authoritarian, there would be a lot of comedians and satirists in jail. I can't wait to see if Obama is as tolerant of criticism and mockery as Bush has been. I wonder what Obama will do if somebody make a movie about his assassination or mocks his children or makes fun of his wife?

I doubt Obama will provide nearly the amount of material. The comedy industry is going to lose a great contributor when W fades away.

Originally Posted by Octoldit

Such leaders possess most,

if not all, of these traits:
* dominating
* opposes equality
* desirous of personal power
* amoral
* intimidating and bullying
* faintly hedonistic
* vengeful
* pitiless
* exploitive
* manipulative
* dishonest
* cheats to win
* highly prejudiced (racist, sexist, homophobic)
* mean-spirited
* militant
* nationalistic
* tells others what they want to hear
* takes advantage of "suckers"
* specializes in creating false images to sell self
* may or may not be religious
* usually politically and economically conservative/Republican

Wow, you got Barack Obama and Joe Biden described to a tee.

Specifically, such followers can be described as follows:

* submissive to authority
* aggressive on behalf of authority
* highly conventional in their behavior
* highly religious
* possessing moderate to little education
* trusting of untrustworthy authorities
* prejudiced (particularly against homosexuals and followers of religions other than their own)
* mean-spirited
* narrow-minded
* intolerant
* bullying
* zealous
* dogmatic
* uncritical toward chosen authority
* hypocritical
* inconsistent and contradictory
* prone to panic easily
* highly self-righteous
* moralistic
* strict disciplinarians
* severely punitive
* demanding loyalty and returning it
* possessing little self-awareness
* usually politically and economically conservative/Republican

You got the Obamaniacs described to a tee also.

McPalin is a joke candidate. Obiden is the aspiring authoritarian.

Originally Posted by dbelkau

I doubt Obama will provide nearly the amount of material. The comedy industry is going to lose a great contributor when W fades away.

Of course- Chairman Obama is going to shut them down.

What do you people call "Authoritarian"? What I call authoritarian is a government that makes sure it's people are dependant upon them. Everything that the conservatives and republicans preach is that you have the ability (or should I say freedom) to do as you please, make your own choices.
Become as rich as you can make yourself or do nothing at all - it's all up to you.

In america everyone can become a millionaire - everyone. That's not true in nations that have higher taxes and heavy government interfearance

Originally Posted by Mabol zar Hari

What do you people call "Authoritarian"? What I call authoritarian is a government that makes sure it's people are dependant upon them. Everything that the conservatives and republicans preach is that you have the ability (or should I say freedom) to do as you please, make your own choices.
Become as rich as you can make yourself or do nothing at all - it's all up to you.

In america everyone can become a millionaire - everyone. That's not true in nations that have higher taxes and heavy government interfearance

Except marrying a gay partner? And except aborting a fetus that will kill me if I carry it?

Your use of the word "Everything" is incorrect.

Oh, Republican administrations don't ensure superior economic growth over Democratic administrations historically. Our current situation is unusual, but to imply that a McCain adminstration for whatever reason is the only thing that is capable of saving our economy would demonstrate an abundant lack of realism, too much campaign rhetoric to be specific.

Originally Posted by Goldwater

Except marrying a gay partner? And except aborting a fetus that will kill me if I carry it?

Your use of the word "Everything" is incorrect.

Oh, Republican administrations don't ensure superior economic growth over Democratic administrations historically. Our current situation is unusual, but to imply that a McCain adminstration for whatever reason is the only thing that is capable of saving our economy would demonstrate an abundant lack of realism, too much campaign rhetoric to be specific.

Oh, I thought there were abortions and gay marriage in the USA.