Thread: Obama names Wesley Clark as VP!

Originally Posted by Pragmatist

HAHA, gothcha there didn't I?

I think he would be an excellent choice.

He looks good in those fancy sweaters. But no, he wouldn't be my first choice.

Originally Posted by Pragmatist

Sorry I don't bother clicking on the garbage you post either. I have seen and heard enough of Obama to know he is not Bush and would think very carefully before jumping headfirst into a pile of shit. Bush was stupid enough to enjoy it and Mccain can't see or smell the stuff anymore and would probably fall face first into it without knowing. Thats reason enough to vote for Obama.

I knew I was wasting my time, when the truth about Obama comes out you guys run off or complain that it is all wrong. Hell I am surprised you haven't pulled the race card yet.

Originally Posted by michaelr

Of course I do.

So even after all this you have no problem with the Clinton Admin cozying up to Bin Laden associates?

Congressional Record: September 26, 2002 (Senate)
Page S9364-S9366

HOMELAND SECURITY

In September 1998, the Intelligence Community obtained information that Usama Bin Laden's next operation could involve flying an aircraft loaded with explosives into a U.S. airport and detonating it; this information was provided to senior U.S. Government officials in late 1998.

In the fall of 1998, the Intelligence Community received additional information concerning a Bin-Laden plot involving aircraft in the New York and Washington, DC, areas;

In November 1998, the Intelligence Community learned that a Bin Laden was attempting to recruit a group of five to seven young men from the United States to strike U.S. domestic targets.

In the spring of 1999, the Intelligence Community learned about a planned Bin Laden attack on a U.S. Government facility in Washington, DC.

Additionally, in 1999, the threat of an explosive-laden aircraft being used in a suicide attack against the Pentagon, CIA headquarters, or the White House, was noted in a Library of Congress report to the National Intelligence Council.

In late 1999, the Intelligence Community learned of Bin Laden's possible plans to attack targets in Washington, DC, and New York City during the New Year's Millennium celebrations.

On December 14, 1999, an individual named Ahmed Ressam was arrested as he attempted to enter the United States from Canada with detonator materials in his car. Ressam's intended target was Los Angeles International Airport. Ressam, who has links to Usama Bin Laden's terrorist network, has not been formally sentenced yet.

In March 2000, the Intelligence Community obtained information regarding the types of targets that operatives in Bin Laden's network might strike. The Statue of Liberty was specifically mentioned, as were skyscrapers, ports, and airports, and nuclear power plants;}

Senator Specter on Homeland Security and Intelligence

4 actual attacks on Americans overseas, 8 credible threats to attack U.S. soil even specifying airliners and the eventual targets, how much more did the Clinton administration need to pull their heads out of their collective asses? This went on over the course of both of his terms, 1993 - 2001. They were damn well aware of Bin Ladens affiliation with the KLA while Clark was pressing the flesh with KLA leaders, quite the Neville Chamberlin.

Originally Posted by Davocrat

He looks good in those fancy sweaters. But no, he wouldn't be my first choice.

Guess what Davo?! I'm in love with the Orbit Gum girl, I just realized it! I think it's the way she talks.


Anyway...Wesley Clarke has Operational experience commanding over 100,000 troops. The Republican media has been demonizing him for years, even during the war, because they're well aware that an unbashed Wesley Clarke is a huge threat. While Republicans call anyone who questions Ceasar, sorry I mean Patreus, an "out of line" traitor, Wesley Clarke took all kinds of shots from an infant Fox news. He shouldn't have given that rabble of hyena's called the McCain campaign strategists ammo when he tried to point out the he was a high level commander, and McCain was not. After that Republicans say that Clarke beat up McCain's 90 year old Mom. Pee'd on McCain's lawn. And was responsible for having drinks with Milosovic and....I'm sorry.....(Choked up)....I can't say the rest...(sob)

Originally Posted by Goldwater

Guess what Davo?! I'm in love with the Orbit Gum girl, I just realized it! I think it's the way she talks.


Anyway...Wesley Clarke has Operational experience commanding over 100,000 troops. The Republican media has been demonizing him for years, even during the war, because they're well aware that an unbashed Wesley Clarke is a huge threat. While Republicans call anyone who questions Ceasar, sorry I mean Patreus, an "out of line" traitor, Wesley Clarke took all kinds of shots from an infant Fox news. He shouldn't have given that rabble of hyena's called the McCain campaign strategists ammo when he tried to point out the he was a high level commander, and McCain was not. After that Republicans say that Clarke beat up McCain's 90 year old Mom. Pee'd on McCain's lawn. And was responsible for having drinks with Milosovic and....I'm sorry.....(Choked up)....I can't say the rest...(sob)

I take it you like the guy as a VP?

Originally Posted by Professor Peabody

So even after all this you have no problem with the Clinton Admin cozying up to Bin Laden associates?

4 actual attacks on Americans overseas, 8 credible threats to attack U.S. soil even specifying airliners and the eventual targets, how much more did the Clinton administration need to pull their heads out of their collective asses? This went on over the course of both of his terms, 1993 - 2001. They were damn well aware of Bin Ladens affiliation with the KLA while Clark was pressing the flesh with KLA leaders, quite the Neville Chamberlin.

Somehow you misunderstood me, you had better believe that I have had a problem with it. Sorry for the confusion.

Originally Posted by Pragmatist

I take it you like the guy as a VP?

Hey Prag! Oh yea! I just don't think the Obama campaign people could manage his liabilities. I hate giving credit for that to Republicans especialy when 90% of the party are meglomaniacs. They have an arsenal of allegations proven and otherwise and treat even the unproven ones like the word of God.

I think Obama will find someone with street cred in economics. He's going to take the reigns as a CIC. JMO

Originally Posted by Defensor

Obama opposed troop withdrawal in 2004. His current anti-war stance is phony. He is a neocon warmonger.

He just realizes that once we got into Iraq (which he didn't want to do) then the best course of event from us would be to stay there a few years to see if it could work. and it has.

There was nothing he could do about the destruction in Iraq after the invasion had taken place. He knew that we couldn't go back in time.

Originally Posted by Goldwater

I think Obama will find someone with street cred in economics.

That just reminded me... he should get Bill Clinton!!! That would be awsome! (even though it would prevent him from getting ellected...)