Chrysler Dealers Striking back at Obama with Quo-Warranto

1st January 2010 04:14 PM

Description: Former Chrysler Dealer Jim Anderer breaks down the continued legal action against the auto manufacturer and what is a Quo Warranto? This sounds pretty serious.

Video of James Anderer explaining the case. Please watch

http://www.foxbusine...q=james+anderer

Background:

Last summer, hundreds of Chrysler and GM Dealers lost their franchises in the Chrysler bankruptcy sale. Many of those dealers vowed to fight what they saw as a heavy miscarriage of justice. It was simply un-American, and shocking to find that something like this could happen here, that the government could take over a private business, and then take that business away from hundreds of private dealerships.

Many of those dealers had profitable businesses; in some cases those businesses had been run by families successfully for 50 years, in some cases more.

The case has been filed by a group of dealers (20 or more) who lost their businesses in the Washington D.C. District Court. Leo Denofrio and Stephen Pidgeon are the lawyers who the dealers have retained for the case. They have been retained to bring two actions:

1. A motion to reconsider the Court's approval of the dealer rejections.

2. A quo warranto in the D.C. District Court pertaining to Obama and his administration.

The Bankruptcy case will be brought in the Southern district of New York Bankruptcy Court, the Quo Warranto will be brought in the Washington D.C. District court, the only court in the nation where a Quo Warranto can be filed against a sitting President.

**michaelr** · 1st January 2010 04:34 PM

[quote name='U.S. Army Retired' date='01 January 2010 - 03:14 PM' timestamp='1262387675' post='90084']

Description: Former Chrysler Dealer Jim Anderer breaks down the continued legal action against the auto manufacturer and what is a Quo Warranto? This sounds pretty serious.

Video of James Anderer explaining the case. Please watch

http://www.foxbusine...q=james+anderer

Background:

Last summer, hundreds of Chrysler and GM Dealers lost their franchises in the Chrysler bankruptcy sale. Many of those dealers vowed to fight what they saw as a heavy miscarriage of justice. It was simply un-American, and shocking to find that something like this could happen here, that the government could take over a private business, and then take that business away from hundreds of private dealerships.

Many of those dealers had profitable businesses; in some cases those businesses had been run by families successfully for 50 years, in some cases more.

The case has been filed by a group of dealers (20 or more) who lost their businesses in the Washington D.C. District Court. Leo Denofrio and Stephen Pidgeon are the lawyers who the dealers have retained for the case. They have been retained to bring two actions:

1. A motion to reconsider the Court's approval of the dealer rejections.

2. A quo warranto in the D.C. District Court pertaining to Obama and his administration.

The Bankruptcy case will be brought in the Southern district of New York Bankruptcy Court, the Quo Warranto will be brought in the Washington D.C. District court, the only court in the nation where a Quo Warranto can be filed against a sitting President.

[/quote]

Quo warranto

By what warrant. It seems that Chrysler wants to know how or what gives the government the power to shut its dealerships down. It seem appropriate!

**Blah** · 1st January 2010 04:40 PM

I hope they sue the crap out of them.

The preferred debt holders should get their money back as well, the Obomites

had not right to ignore the legal statues of preferred note holders to bail out

their union friends.

Unions are this administrations Haliburton.

1st January 2010 04:47 PM

[quote name='michaelr' date='01 January 2010 - 05:34 PM' timestamp='1262388891' post='90101']

Quo warranto

By what warrant. It seems that Chrysler wants to know how or what gives the government the power to shut its dealerships down. It seem appropriate!

[/quote]

I did some research on the attorneys and Leo Donofrio and Pidgeon were the ones who tried to remove Obama in the courts over his Eligibility to hold office. Could this Quo Warranto be a motive by them to question his eligibility or authority to close the dealerships

**michaelr** · 1st January 2010 04:54 PM

[quote name='U.S. Army Retired' date='01 January 2010 - 03:47 PM' timestamp='1262389651' post='90103']

I did some research on the attorneys and Leo Donofrio and Pidgeon were the ones who tried to remove Obama in the courts over his Eligibility to hold office. Could this Quo Warranto be a motive by them to question his eligibility or authority to close the dealerships

[/quote]

I think you hit on something that I missed....

English lords held their lands and exercised their jurisdictions (often the right to hold a court and collect its profits).

Later, quo warranto functioned as a court order (or "writ") to show proof of authority; for example, demanding that someone acting as the sheriff prove that the king had actually appointed him to that office (literally, "By whose warrant are you the sheriff?").

I will keep my eye on the subject and update the thread with any findings.

Good eye.

**Blah** · 1st January 2010 05:00 PM

The President can only exert those powers afforded by Constitutionally legitimate

laws of the land. Whatever direction the case goes it's clear the complaint is that

the White House had no right to play dictator, or circumvent some peoples rights

for the sake of others.

1st January 2010 05:13 PM

So basically the Chrysler Dealers are going to use a Quo-Warranto as a legal tactic to try to get Obama to release his Vital Records and Birth Certificate to prove if he is a Natural Born Citizen and thus constitutionally eligible to hold office and thus had the authority to shut them down? This sounds interesting. I wonder if the media realizes this? This might be a big story if it involves Chrysler dealers and TARP funds and the Birth Certificate story all in one lawsuit.

Watch this dealer explain his case and reasons:

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=-DopIqKOm4s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xO4Jf...eature=related

**Blah** · 1st January 2010 05:26 PM

[quote name='U.S. Army Retired' date='01 January 2010 - 04:13 PM' timestamp='1262391218' post='90110']

Watch this dealer explain his case and reasons:

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=-DopIqKOm4s

http://www.youtube.c...feature=related

[/quote]

I didnt hear any birther crap it those videos, just abuse of power.

**Pragmatist** · 1st January 2010 05:47 PM

Looks like we got another live one!

**michaelr** · 1st January 2010 05:48 PM

[quote name='bla bla' date='01 January 2010 - 04:26 PM' timestamp='1262392005' post='90116']

I didnt hear any birther crap it those videos, just abuse of power.

[/quote]

I am not buying into the birther stuff, but I do not want these people hindered.

I see this as I stated, 'what gives this criminal government the right to shut down legitimate business?'