Thread: State Sponsored Terror US Style....again

MAY 24, (LPAC)--In an interview with CNN on Tuesday, May 22, New Yorker magazine investigative journalist Seymour Hersh repeated charges he published in that magazine in March, that the Bush Administration has been working with Saudi Arabia to arm Sunni fundamentalist cells, to fight Hezbollah. The recent explosion of violence in northern Lebanon between the Lebanese Army and the previously little-known group Fatah al-Islam, is but the latest example of this rotten collusion, Hersh charged.

The Truth Found Here..........

Cheney's Pals Found Here............


Sure is a good thing this war on terror, hows it working for you?????

Hersh's assessment is very interesting, to say the least. This works with the PNAC strategy as well.

Originally Posted by Bluegrass

Hersh's assessment is very interesting, to say the least. This works with the PNAC strategy as well.

Well were using AQ to blow up shit in Iran, so in a big but fucked up way, this story did not surprise me.

It's good to have such friendly enemies.:whistling:

Bush is baking a cake for Obama that will blow up on his watch. End of story.

Originally Posted by william the wierd

Bush is baking a cake for Obama that will blow up on his watch. End of story.

I don't support Obama, because he is part of the same overall elitist agenda as the other two, but Bush Administration foreign policy is something I will never miss:

I just don,t think that big gun suites him. I bet we have members who have that pic on their wall...err will did until it became like flypaper.

Originally Posted by michaelr

Well were using AQ to blow up shit in Iran, so in a big but fucked up way, this story did not surprise me.

It's good to have such friendly enemies.:whistling:

This story was very familiar. It is sad that we have come to expect this type of behavior.

Originally Posted by michaelr

I just don,t think that big gun suites him. I bet we have members who have that pic on their wall...err will did until it became like flypaper.

I was laughing pretty hard the first time I saw it.

First of all michaelr's citing of wikipedia does more to discredit his arguments than support them since any moron can edit the wikipedia article he cited.

Second, what is wrong with funding an enemy to kill another enemy, thereby keeping both at bay and unbalanced?

what does michaelr have against al qaeda and hezbollah killing each other with a little help from the USA?

Originally Posted by Bluegrass

I don't support Obama, because he is part of the same overall elitist agenda as the other two, but Bush Administration foreign policy is something I will never miss:

dude your going to miss bush if obama gets elected and every rogue, bloodletter, and badman has a field day at the expense of the free world.

remember the nightmare that was jimmy carter -- when the naive geopoltical neophyte obama takes the helm, he will make jimmy carter look like andrew jackson in comparison.