Thread: Clinton - Warmonger not Woman

alJazeera Magazine - Sister Hillary

Hillary announced her readiness to reduce 70 million innocent Iranian lives to ashes so that she could imagine her picture in the White House. Her lust for ambition will never be satisfied; on the contrary, it seems to grow more inflamed with the prospect of mass murder. After all, this is nothing new to her.
Hillary knowingly supported the Iraq war to defend the “future of freedom�. In her drive for the Iraq war, she was supported by the Progressive Policy Institute, a self-described think-tank of the Democratic Leadership Council[i].
Perhaps no one describes the group better than former neoconservative Jacob Heilbrunn who wrote: “Don't look now, but neoconservatism is making a comeback-and not among the Republicans who have made it famous, but in the Democratic Party,"[ii]. Indeed, many of them supported the war for the purpose of promoting democracy.
Her ideology has contributed to the nation’s moral bankruptcy, the loss of over one million lives, and the depletion of America’s treasury. These neoliberals who have driven us into a quagmire, elaborated it would serve America’s interest to promote the Democratic peace theory.

Press TV - Hillary and Condi--any difference?

Does it not matter to you that Clinton voted for the war against Iraq, that she did not have the judgment that millions upon millions of people throughout the world had to stand against Bush's obvious deception.

Does it not matter to you that she is now blaming the Iraqis for not stepping up to the plate - meaning not signing over their oil rights to us, does it not matter that in her war-provoking alliance with men in Congress, especially the right wing she voted to have the Iranian Army listed as a terrorist group, a step toward a US attack on Iran? or that she refused to support a ban on cluster bombs after a million of them, made and sent by the US, were dropped by Israel on villages and neighborhoods of Lebanon in 2006?

Does it not matter to you that having turned over 4 million Iraqis - yes mostly women and children into refugees in a war she supported, she stands ready to do that to Iranian women and children?

Does sisterhood have such a thin veneer that all of those Iraqi lives are forgetten in order to have a woman in the White House? Then why not Condoleezza Rice? Is there that much difference between them?

(Courtesy Professor Kathleen Barry Kathy.barry@comcast.net and CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names,)

(Editor's note: And what of Senator Clinton's recent remarks about obliterating Iran should it launch a nuclear attack on Israel? Of course for her the fact that Iran does not have nuclear weapons is besides the point, which is really to help set the stage for an eventual attack on the Islamic Republic. Not a small thing to threaten with murder 70m people--the warning itself sounds an awful lot like a war crime. Let the reader bear in mind that the Clinton White House years to which Hillary so tenaciously defends in her presidential campaign, also oversaw the killing of 1m Iraqis--not by military means primarily but through starvation and denial of medical supplies. The figure of 1m dead having been the number Pope John Paul II referred to, as have many other sources.)
HAR/HAR

A good portray of this would-be mass murderer.

Clinton is a warmonger but so are McCain and Obama. Prepare for war.