Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is 'unconscionable'

**michaelr** · 5th December 2009 10:14 AM

Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is 'unconscionable'

Science, facts, who needs them, they will just crank up the 'pity the poor scientist' hype and set policy according to plan. They simply have too much to lose if they back off. This type of behavior is nothing short of dictatorship.

**kmiller1610** · 5th December 2009 02:12 PM

[quote name='michaelr' date='05 December 2009 - 12:14 PM' timestamp='1260033270' post='73463']

Obama's refusal to investigate 'Climategate' emails is 'unconscionable'

Science, facts, who needs them, they will just crank up the 'pity the poor scientist' hype and set policy according to plan. They simply have too much to lose if they back off. This type of behavior is nothing short of dictatorship.

[/quote]

We will be the idiots if we allow it to happen.

**michaelr** · 5th December 2009 02:21 PM

[quote name='kmiller1610' date='05 December 2009 - 01:12 PM' timestamp='1260047576' post='73562']

We will be the idiots if we allow it to happen.

[/quote]

Shut up Flat Earther.......

Gordon Brown: climate-change sceptics are 'flat-earthers'

**Fishmint** · 5th December 2009 02:27 PM

[quote name='michaelr' date='05 December 2009 - 05:14 PM' timestamp='1260033270' post='73463']

Science, facts, who needs them, they will just crank up the 'pity the poor scientist' hype and set policy according to plan. [/quote]

Could you be more ironic? Time and time again you have demonstrated a total distrust of scientists, and a fundamental misunderstanding of the modern scientifoc method. If I was forming an opinion on Neuroscience, I wouldn't form it outside of what nuero scientists determine. I can have an opinion, but it should be informed by the science of Neuroscientists.

The fact is, global warming has a consensus behind it in the scientific community that makes string theory look like a joke. There are thousands of papers out of many countries in support of anthropogenic global warming. The only real debate going on is how much humans are affecting temperatures.

Science has faced opposition for a very long time, and they are naturally not very good communicators. You can continue to wave your hands in the air screaming about global socialism and tax scemes or whatever, it won't matter. You are confusing politics with science.

**michaelr** · 5th December 2009 02:37 PM

[quote name='Fishmint' date='05 December 2009 - 01:27 PM' timestamp='1260048435' post='73574']

Could you be more ironic? Time and time again you have demonstrated a total distrust of scientists, and a fundamental misunderstanding of the modern scientifoc method. If I was forming an opinion on Neuroscience, I wouldn't form it outside of what nuero scientists determine. I can have an opinion, but it should be informed by the science of Neuroscientists.

The fact is, global warming has a consensus behind it in the scientific community that makes string theory look like a joke. There are thousands of papers out of many countries in support of anthropogenic global warming. The only real debate going on is how much humans are affecting temperatures.

Science has faced opposition for a very long time, and they are naturally not very good communicators. You can continue to wave your hands in the air screaming about global socialism and tax scemes or whatever, it won't matter. You are confusing politics with science.

[/quote]

is there any wonder why I do not trust "scientist"

Hey, does "hide the decline" mean anything to you. Let me translate, the earth is cooling and that little fact needs to be hidden.

**Fishmint** · 5th December 2009 02:40 PM

[quote name='michaelr' date='05 December 2009 - 09:37 PM' timestamp='1260049050' post='73576']

is there any wonder why I do not trust "scientist"

Hey, does "hide the decline" mean anything to you. Let me translate, the earth is cooling and that little fact needs to be hidden.

[/quote]

I think I've made myself clear.

**michaelr** · 5th December 2009 02:43 PM

[quote name='Fishmint' date='05 December 2009 - 01:40 PM' timestamp='1260049229' post='73579']

I think I've made myself clear.

[/quote]

Pat yourself on the back, personally you made zero sense, but that is what you do. You defended this lie for so long, I think you believe it. Well data shows you wrong.