Thread: we did it! Climate-Gate makes WSJ front section!

We did it!



Popular grass roots activism wins the day!



Bret Stephens put ClimateGate in the main section of today's Wall Street Journal!



Opinion page, A-17



Check it out.



We the People -> Angry Phone Calls -> Reporter Interest -> Noteworthy News Story -> Wall Street Journal

[quote name='nonsqtr' date='01 December 2009 - 12:49 PM' timestamp='1259689787' post='70651']

We did it!



Popular grass roots activism wins the day!



Bret Stephens put ClimateGate in the main section of today's Wall Street Journal!



Opinion page, A-17



Check it out.



We the People -> Angry Phone Calls -> Reporter Interest -> Noteworthy News Story -> Wall Street Journal





[/quote]



so its an op-ed, not an actual article?

[quote name='michaelr' date='01 December 2009 - 12:56 PM' timestamp='1259690160' post='70654']

Why do you support the liars. Do you not know that you have been brainwashed into not only believing a lie, but defending it as well? You really need to admit this to yourself.

[/quote]



what in the world are you talking about?! i was only asking to clarify.



oh, and AGAIN, before you go shooting your fucking mouth off, i've ALREADY told you i'm not a proponent of man made global warming.

[quote name='michaelr' date='01 December 2009 - 01:00 PM' timestamp='1259690424' post='70658']

You sure sound like you are!

[/quote]



and sure sound like a person that doesn't fucking pay attention to what people tell you.



so before you open you big fucking mouth, why don't you make sure you have your facts straight.

[quote name='michaelr' date='01 December 2009 - 01:03 PM' timestamp='1259690606' post='70660']

Is this post legal?? I think not!

[/quote]



i have no idea what the means. just get your facts straight before you go falsely accusing someone of something next time.

[quote name='nickcuse' date='01 December 2009 - 12:52 PM' timestamp='1259689930' post='70652']

so its an op-ed, not an actual article?

[/quote]



It's an Op-Ed in the front section of the mainstream domestic media.



This is a big deal, Nick. We spent most of the day yesterday calling around to make sure this would happen.



NOW you'll start hearing it on CNN and MS-NBC, probably take another day, but it'll get play.



Keep in mind, WSJ is the most widely read newspaper by businessmen and investors here in this country.



Typically, people read the two columns on the left of the front page, then turn immediately to the Opinion page.



Look at the title - what does it say? "Follow the Money", right?



And, what are the words I keep using in print over and over and over again, even right here in this forum?



"Follow the Money", right?







This is a great victory, Nick.



Well done, People! I am very proud of you, ladies and gentlemen!



And a heartfelt THANK YOU to all who participated, from We the People!!!

To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.



- Thomas Jefferson

[quote name='nonsqtr' date='01 December 2009 - 01:08 PM' timestamp='1259690932' post='70664']

It's an Op-Ed in the front section of the mainstream domestic media.



This is a big deal, Nick. We spent most of the day yesterday calling around to make sure this would happen.



NOW you'll start hearing it on CNN and MS-NBC, probably take another day, but it'll get play.



Keep in mind, WSJ is the most widely read newspaper by businessmen and investors here in this country.



Typically, people read the two columns on the left of the front page, then turn immediately to the Opinion page.



Look at the title - what does it say? "Follow the Money", right?



And, what are the words I keep using in print over and over and over again, even right here in this forum?



"Follow the Money", right?







This is a great victory, Nick.



Well done, People! I am very proud of you, ladies and gentlemen!



And a heartfelt THANK YOU to all who participated, from We the People!!!













[/quote]



its interesting that this op-ed you're so proud of HARDLY has the same slant on the issue that some people have put on it. so i applaud the author for not jump to such crazy conclusions and taking such a partisan stance as we've seen from other people on the issue.