Thread: Good News = Less News on Iraq War

Good News = Less News on Iraq War

Back in September, when General David Petraeus reported that the surge in U.S. troops had improved the security situation in Iraq, the big three broadcast networks were openly skeptical.

“Insurgent attacks are down from 170 in January to 120 in August,” ABC’s Terry McCarthy noted on the September 9 World News Sunday, the day before Petraeus testified before Congress. “But that is still four attacks a day, on average. Iraq remains a very violent place....Life in central Iraq is still deadly dangerous.”

“Victory is not at hand, not even in sight,” CBS’s David Martin similarly contended on the next night’s Evening News. On the NBC Nightly News, reporter Jim Maceda found it “palpably quiet” in an area of Iraq once controlled by Sunni insurgents, but “this is really an exception....That civil war as, again, as you get out of the capital of Baghdad, it is truly brewing. So this is really just a partial success for this surge so far.”

That was three months ago. Now, all three networks have become more optimistic in their on-ground reporting from the war zone, admitting that the surge in troops and new counterinsurgency tactics have reduced the violence. But as the news from the war front improves, a Media Research Center study finds ABC, CBS and NBC are less likely to tell viewers about it.

MRC researchers examined all 354 Iraq war stories that aired on the big three evening newscasts from September 1 through November 30, including weekends. That figure includes 234 field reports, plus 120 short headline items read by the news anchor.

■ Vanishing War. Back in September, as reporters voiced skepticism of General Petraeus’ progress report, the networks aired a total of 178 Iraq stories, or just under two per network per night. (See chart.) About one-fourth of those stories (42) were filed from Iraq itself, with most of the rest originating in Washington.

In October, TV’s war news fell by about 40 percent, to 108 stories, with the number of reports filed from Iraq itself falling to just 20, or less than one-fifth of all Iraq stories. By November, the networks aired a mere 68 stories, with only eleven (16%) actually from the war zone itself.

■ Pessimistic CBS. Of the three evening newscasts, ABC’s World News was the first to take serious note of the improving situation (back on October 1), and has offered the most stories (9 field reports, 7 from Iraq) detailing the progress. “Not only is there a huge increase in Iraqi citizens groups who are coming forward to help the Americans, but overall levels of violence have gone way down,” Terry McCarthy enthused on November 22. In a Thanksgiving week interview with President Bush, anchor Charles Gibson was congratulatory: “You took a lot of doubting and rather skeptical questions about the surge. I'll give you a chance to crow. Do you want to say I told you so?”

On NBC, reporter Tom Aspell filed five stories about progress, generally balancing good news with bad. “Refugees coming back to Baghdad are going to see a lot of changes. There are more people in the streets, shops are open and traffic everywhere,” Aspell noted November 27. “But it is still a dangerous city.”

For its part, the CBS Evening News has offered only three stories documenting the recent progress, just one from their reporter in Iraq, Lara Logan, on November 21. Five weeks earlier, Logan announced on NBC’s Tonight Show that the war was going “extremely badly, from my point of view.” Reality, she claimed, was “much worse than the picture, the image we even have of Iraq.” — Rich Noyes





Good News = Less News on Iraq War -- 12/04/2007 - Media Research Center - Media Reality Check

Con:

No bias here....nope.

It's just another ploy to tone down the rhetoric from Iraq because the GOP knows that they don't stand a chance in the elections. So now, the attempt to slowly ease the tension amongst the American public and slowly try to get us not to think about Iraq as much. Then, they'll throw some other major news and event at us to try and get us looking in another direction. It's a nice try, and although it has worked many times before, this time it will do the GOP no good.

Originally Posted by TurnBackTheClock

It's just another ploy to tone down the rhetoric from Iraq because the GOP knows that they don't stand a chance in the elections. So now, the attempt to slowly ease the tension amongst the American public and slowly try to get us not to think about Iraq as much. Then, they'll throw some other major news and event at us to try and get us looking in another direction. It's a nice try, and although it has worked many times before, this time it will do the GOP no good.

So let me get this straight....you are saying that the "conservative" news media is trying to erase the war from the American people's minds so as to help them in the election?

Even though the news from Iraq is good and getting better everyday....and that will help the GOP...they are ignoring the good news in favor of silence?

Nice spin...but since 80% of the MSM identifies themselves as favoring Democrats...I think that occums razor dictates the simpler conclusion.

You knew this would happen Con. The sad thing is that few people will actually care.

Originally Posted by mdmx96

You knew this would happen Con. The sad thing is that few people will actually care.

Sad, but true....

I think no news is good news would have been even better if this %$@# war would have never began in the first place. But then again Bush would have found something else to *(^%$ up.

Hey are you sure your story is current? That reporter looks like a young Dan Rather.:sarcasticfainting:

Originally Posted by steezer

Hey are you sure your story is current? That reporter looks like a young Dan Rather.:sarcasticfainting:

Maybe CBS has figured a way to clone Liberals?

Originally Posted by conservative

Maybe CBS has figured a way to clone Liberals?

And that's a bad thing?:waving:

Originally Posted by steezer

And that's a bad thing?:waving:

Well...they do need to replace those they abort. opcorn: