Thread: Why Hillary Clinton is absolutely unbeatable.

Originally Posted by lakeman

I am not absolutely opposed to labels. When they are used accurately they sure save some time. But with the variety of consrvative that exists out there calling them all NEO conservatives is a statement that could use some tweaking.

You're right, point taken.

Originally Posted by stnmann

I predicted Gore would win, he won --but it was stollen.
I predicted Kerry would win, he won a landslide, but it was stollen.
I predict Hillary will win, and if she loses, there will be utter chaos.



Hillary Clinton will be the 44th President of the United States

History proves that the United States of America does not tolerate three morons in a row, it has a two moron limit.

:laughing: :therethere:

Originally Posted by Pragmatist

Absolutely, very well. May not see eye to eye on political issues but such is life. I also have many close friends that are republican warmongers. Hell I love you don't I, and you seem to swallow that bullshit too.

I love you too!:waving:

Originally Posted by Goldwater

...but it won't matter because in one year from January, Hillary, Bill, and Chelsea will be at her Innagural. Then we can take the shread of dignity this country has left and start building on it again.

Bill Clinton certainly did give us alot of dignity...:sarcasm:

Originally Posted by Invayne

Bill Clinton certainly did give us alot of dignity...:sarcasm:

More like dicktoher

Originally Posted by The Time

Doees ne one think Obama has a chance... i like him he's open and considerate of all ways and choices. I don't really think that that's hillary's policy.

He is one of the most considerate people around isn't he. (not sarcasm)

I think he tries to be open and consider all views but in the end he will never deviate from being one of the most liberal people in politics. If you never change your mind on anything are you really open?

In all the general election polls I've seen recently, Hillary is doing the best among the Democratic candidates (I look at the RealClearPolitics averages). Although, (I don't know if someone has said this before, I haven't read all the previous pages on this topic), I think a lot of her candidacy is based on her aura of inevitability, partly bolstered by the media. If she comes in third in Iowa behind Edwards and Obama, that would be a huge blow to the campaign.

And in a side note about polling numbers. In past, pollsters have observed the Bradley effect, which is basically that black candidates have artificially high poll numbers. White voters say they'll support the black candidate, but in the voting booth vote for the white candidate due to societal pressures. I wrote a blog post called "Inflated Clinton Poll Theory - a New Bradley Effect" applying the same principle to a woman candidate. It said that people not wishing to appear sexist say they'll support Clinton, but then vote for someone else on the real ballot.

Originally Posted by Distressed American

Sadly, I think you are right. I say sadly because hillary sucks it hard.

Apparently, she doesn't or else Bill would not have turned to Monica.

With that being said, I don't think she'll even win the primaries. She has no charisma. She's so conservative in some areas that it's not even funny. Many liberals feel she sells people down the drain. She comes off as somebody who will moderate as much as possible for a vote. At the same time, she has a certain liberal history which turns some off. A double edged sword. I bet it will be Edwards who wins the primaries.

Originally Posted by The God Fearing

There are plenty of women that would want for Hillary to have a shot...but there are plenty who are sensible and would vote for the best candidate, regardless of gender. I think it a bit rich to suggest that all women are feminists who believe that a woman deserves to be in the White House simply by virtue of being a woman.

The feminist in me noted something four years ago. Hilary (after Bush won again) talked about wanting to create a "pro-life" set up. I read into it and it turned out to be promoting family planning (so people don't get pregnant). That's fine, but my question is how far she would go to get a vote. She already started using words to please conservatives. My question is whether she would promote actual policy to please conservatives. I'm afraid she would.

Originally Posted by Invayne

Bill Clinton certainly did give us alot of dignity...:sarcasm:

I think Billy's indescretion only violated the fragile sensabilities of some of our family values crowd. Many Democrats and lots of Europeans thought it was much adoo about personal drama. It coulda been done with less infidelity and lying of course. I think it actualy made us look kind of puritanical and "Church Lady" like during Kenneth Starr's inquisition. So I feel the people who critisized Clinton were the ones who reduced the dignity of Americans in the eyes of the world more so that Bill did, if Bill did at all.

Now, the amount of damage Bush has done to our international reputation and our dignity with this wild monkey food fight of a war.....well......I guess I'm gonna get the Surge crowd piling on soon with "surge working", "Patraeus God" "Don't question report you Dem traitor" stuff if I go on....so I'll stop, I think you get my point if you're still reading.

Infidelity=war?......I say war tips the scale in lack of dignity