Thread: Senator Craig Police Audio Tape

I really don't care about this, but I'm sure some people here would like to listen to this...

Senator Craig Police Audio Tape*Video

I'm curious why they argued so much about the "left hand - right hand thing". Does anyone understand the significance of this? Is it part of the "secret code"? Does swiping the the underside of the door with one hand mean something different than if you do it with the other hand or something?

Other than that, I'm pretty much done being interested in this story.

Republican hypocrisy and gay "closetedness". YAWN.

Originally Posted by Blueneck

I'm curious why they argued so much about the "left hand - right hand thing". Does anyone understand the significance of this? Is it part of the "secret code"? Does swiping the the underside of the door with one hand mean something different than if you do it with the other hand or something?

Other than that, I'm pretty much done being interested in this story.

Republican hypocrisy and gay "closetedness". YAWN.

If it was the left, he would have turned around to a great degree to make the motion. It was a cross body move. More deliberate. A righty could have been done from his usual "wide stance"on the can. It would support the casual, just picking up paper argument. A left means, he was not doing his usual john business (unless he was getting ready to pay I guess).

Originally Posted by Distressed American

If it was the left, he would have turned around to a great degree to make the motion. It was a cross body move. More deliberate. A righty could have been done from his usual "wide stance"on the can. It would support the casual, just picking up paper argument. A left means, he was not doing his usual john business (unless he was getting ready to pay I guess).

I see. One other detail I thought was interesting was the "wide stance" argument. He was sitting, not standing and how far apart could one's feet be with their pants around their ankles?

He would have done better to keep his mouth shut and call a lawyer. I guess senators are just used to getting away with being really bad liars. Everyone respects their authoritah and doesn't question them too much.

Originally Posted by Blueneck

I see. One other detail I thought was interesting was the "wide stance" argument. He was sitting, not standing and how far apart could one's feet be with their pants around their ankles?

He would have done better to keep his mouth shut and call a lawyer. I guess senators are just used to getting away with being really bad liars. Everyone respects their authoritah and doesn't question them too much.

I'm sure he had taken off his pants in order to uummm use his wide stance!