User Tag List

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 33 of 33
  1. #31
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,353
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    [quote name='Bluegrass' date='06 November 2009 - 05:41 PM' timestamp='1257547293' post='53858']

    Most on this board aren't mindwashed enough to take this dreck seriously. Play the "commie card". That's card has been played for decades, and used when people don't apologize to the self-righteous armchair war heroes. Interventive foreign policy is a new concept, and classic conservatism scoffed at the notion of humping the legs of other countries, being the world police. Because its reckless.

    [/quote]



    My response there was to one poster here, and the description is MORE than apt.

  2. #32
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    11,327
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked 446 Times in 363 Posts
    [quote name='SideTraKd' date='06 November 2009 - 03:00 AM' timestamp='1257494433' post='53505']





    Can there be any doubt at all that Iran is seeking nuclear arms?





    [/quote]



    did you even read your own article?

  3. #33
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,353
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    [quote name='2lane' date='06 November 2009 - 10:24 PM' timestamp='1257564250' post='54050']

    Actually quite a few of us back in 2003 suspected this and said WTF when we attacked Iraq. For the United States Iran has long been an issue and potential problem. It's taken you this long to figure this out well, better late than never - I guess. Unfortunately your president (Mr Bush) has severely limited the US's ability to intervene except in the most dire of circumstances.

    [/quote]



    Yeah, right. You guys only pretended to care about Iran when it could be used a useful political hammer against Bush going into Iraq. You guys shift positions so damned much it is unbelievable. Before Iraq, liberals were screaming bloody murder about the "carpet bombing" of cities in Afghanistan. Funny how that became the GOOD war when it was decided that Iraq could be used better for liberal political purposes. Then, liberals started making the ridiculous assertions that we should have invaded Iran instead (when it was patently obvious that they were only paying lip service to that) despite the fact that there was no previous war with Iran, and they weren't in violation of a cease-fire agreement. That would have ACTUALLY made Iran a pre-emptive war, which liberals supposedly are against. Liberals during Bush's term decried the idea that tough pressure should be put on Iran to stop them from developing nukes. Now, with spineless Obama foreign policy in place, Iran is going full bore to get nukes, and all the Bush Derangement Syndrome crowd can say is it's "Bush's fault!"



    Get real.


 
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. Nuclear arms map of the world. Who has what?
    By katiegrrl0 in forum General World Politics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12th May 2010, 04:32 PM
  2. NATO chief welcomes new Russia-U.S. nuclear arms cuts deal
    By katiegrrl0 in forum Wars, Conflicts and Security
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28th March 2010, 07:20 AM
  3. IAEA chief: Iran not close to developing nuclear weapons
    By Defensor in forum General World Politics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 21st October 2008, 06:26 PM
  4. Pentagon reels from second major nuclear arms blunder in a month
    By michaelr in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27th October 2007, 02:17 PM
  5. Iran Seeks More Arms for Hezbollah
    By ilikeGW in forum General World Politics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 4th August 2006, 10:07 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2