Thread: Democrat Surrender telethon Tonight

Democrat Surrender telethon Tonight

By I.M. Kunzervativ
7/17/07 45 Minutes ago



Democrats, anxious to move forward their planned surrender, have decided to have a "Telethon to save Surrender". Leaders Nancy pelosi, Harry Reid, Dick Durbin, Jack Murtha and Chuck Schumer will be staying at the Capital all night for this bloviating blusterfest. Workers have brought in coffee, sandwiches, and Depends to help enable the ancient Democart leader pull their first all nighters in 50 years.



"I remember one all nighter as a young boy where my freinds and I drank fourteen 2-liters of Verner's. We all had a swell time urinating and talking all night. Tonight we will be doing much the same." said Harry Reid.

"We will be presenting our plan between potty breaks." stated Jack Mutha.

"I've seen the plan" said Nancy Pelosi, "And boy it will be good for us...I mean America".




The Democrats pleaded for callers to show their patriotism and send little white flags to the White House. "We feel that abandoning the Iraqis into their own ethnic cleansing at the hands of Al Queda is not our problem" stated one Distressed American at the Telethon.

Call: 1-800-SURRENDER

Originally Posted by conservative

The Democrats pleaded for callers to show their patriotism and send little white flags to the White House. "We feel that abandoning the Iraqis into their own ethnic cleansing at the hands of Al Queda is not our problem" stated one Distressed American at the Telethon.

Shouldn't this be in Political Humor? Or Rant and Rave. :whistling:

Anyways it looks like a dumb stunt to me.

I dont get that list he's holding.

Isnt more troops and more money SUPPORTING a war as opposed to surrendering?

Originally Posted by Dr.Knuckles

I dont get that list he's holding.

Isnt more troops and more money SUPPORTING a war as opposed to surrendering?

It's some joke.

WHo are we going to "surrender" to if they were to force a withdrawal. Who turns over the sword and where?

Withdrawal is not surrender no matter how hard you try to stigmatize doing the right thing and ceasing to fight a sectarian civil war that does nothing to make us more safe and everything to sap the resources that should be being to used elsewhere to meet that goal.

Originally Posted by Distressed American

WHo are we going to "surrender" to if they were to force a withdrawal. Who turns over the sword and where?

Withdrawal is not surrender no matter how hard you try to stigmatize doing the right thing and ceasing to fight a sectarian civil war that does nothing to make us more safe and everything to sap the resources that should be being to used elsewhere to meet that goal.

So letting terrorists take over Iraq will make us safer? Please explain how....

And it is surrender. Harry Reid proclaimed that we have "Lost"...and when someone loses...someone wins...Al Qaeda has won according to Democrat Leader Harry Reid.

Originally Posted by Distressed American

WHo are we going to "surrender" to if they were to force a withdrawal. Who turns over the sword and where?

Withdrawal is not surrender no matter how hard you try to stigmatize doing the right thing and ceasing to fight a sectarian civil war that does nothing to make us more safe and everything to sap the resources that should be being to used elsewhere to meet that goal.

I'm just curious but where are all the conservatives who said that if the Iraqi government asked us to leave, we should leave? Hasn't the Iraqi government said they no longer need us? Let's bring the troops home. It's not surrender. We've been released from our obligation to deal with the Iraqi Civil War.

Originally Posted by Burning Giraffe

I'm just curious but where are all the conservatives who said that if the Iraqi government asked us to leave, we should leave? Hasn't the Iraqi government said they no longer need us? Let's bring the troops home. It's not surrender. We've been released from our obligation to deal with the Iraqi Civil War.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari warned earlier this week of civil war and the government's collapse if the Americans leave. But al-Maliki told reporters Saturday, "We say in full confidence that we are able, God willing, to take the responsibility completely in running the security file if the international forces withdraw at any time they want."

But he added that Iraqi forces are "still in need of more weapons and rehabilitation" to be ready in the case of a withdrawal.

Doesn't sound to me like they are asking us to leave...

Originally Posted by conservative

Doesn't sound to me like they are asking us to leave...

Well, why don't we leave them some of our weapons then on our way out. President Bush cannot be trusted to oversea this war, or any war for that matter. He doesn't listen to the generals and we aren't making any progress. If the Iraqi government can take care of things themselves, then why not let them? Why stay? We can keep some small operative units and aircraft carriers in the region if we need to kill some bad guys.

Originally Posted by Burning Giraffe

Well, why don't we leave them some of our weapons then on our way out. President Bush cannot be trusted to oversea this war, or any war for that matter. He doesn't listen to the generals and we aren't making any progress. If the Iraqi government can take care of things themselves, then why not let them? Why stay? We can keep some small operative units and aircraft carriers in the region if we need to kill some bad guys.

He is listening to Petrais...and there is progress being made. The Democrats are vested in defeat and can't afford for their to be progress. Why else would the pull this stunt after unanimously confering him under the guidlines that he would give a progress report in September?

Anbar province was one of the most dangerous places in Iraq a year ago...it has made a startling turnaround...that is progress.

You really think that the terrorists will just walk away if we do?