Since the Republicans have amply demonstrated that they can spend money faster than anyone over the last six years of one sided government, I find their assertions that they are fiscal conservatives totally false. Laughably so.
What I see is a party that spends as much or more than any Dem. The only difference I detect at this point is that they demand that we cut taxes for the rich while they spend at record levels. They would clearly rather take the money they are spending from their kids and grand kids than pay for it themselves.
Or course they argue that grows the economy and will generate more tax revenue in the future. Never mind that fact that we are still running a massive deficit and have not even begun to make up the shortfall that they have created with this supposed growth or the fact that when the future bill comes due they will howl about paying the increased taxes then too.
I find that unconscionable. Who robs their children for their own personal gain? What kind of person rips off their own grandchildren to put more money in their pocket now?
So, given that both sides plan to continue to spend like drunken sailors, which would you prefer they do to pay for it?
I'd prefer tax and spend. That way people would actually feel the pain from the spending and might push to reign it in. When you are spending other's money, there is no incentive to curtail it at all.
BTW - Do not bother to complain that I did not include an option for "Don't spend in the first place!". I'm no going to give you any options that the Congress isn't. I don't live in a fantasyland.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks