Lots of Bush administration crimes have been defended on the notion that the current terror threat is so ectreme that is requires torture, restrictions on civil liberties, etc.
But, this threat is not that extreme in our nation's history if you ask me.
We faced down the entire Soviet nuclear arsenal without embracing these violations of the Constitution, international law, federal law, etc.
So which threat is greater? Bin Laden ith a "loose nuke" or a Soviet premier ranting and banging his shoe on the table at the UN with a large arsenal of weapons and the ICBM's to deliver them at the touch of a button?



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks