I've seen folks here try to minimize particular torture techniques to drunken frat party games, call torture victims like John McCain and great generals like Colin Powell pussies, and endore torture in hypothetical scenarios ranging from personally ripping a guys nuts off with pliers in order to save a single life all the way up to 99% certainty that the guy has an active nuke about to go off in a major city.
Throughout I and others have maintained that ANY torture was immoral, illegal and counter-productive, producing more enemes than it neutralizes, especially in counter insurgency and a symetric warfare. We've said that it harmed and killed innocents in increasing numbers as those tortured give up innocents and that in cases where torture is not used and jury trials are the incidents of innocents brutalized are greatly reudced.
Such talk was labeled anti-American and ignorant of the threats we face out of hand.
Every word we've said on the topic completely agrees with the recently published and often discussed Counter Insurgency Manual that was written for the U.S. Army by General Patraeus.
Wonder why he hates America? He must not understand the brutality of the enemy we face and how the treats have changed since the laws were written! These folks will cut your head off!
I've pulled out the sections dealing with torture from the PDF for everyone. I can think of no more authoritative source to back up my argument.
The original full document is here:
http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-24fd.pdf
Discuss...
![]()



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks






Reply With Quote


Bookmarks