Thread: Amero Agenda Admitted On CNBC

Amero Agenda Admitted On CNBC
You Tube | April 23, 2007

This video highlights a very serious concern which none of our media is looking into. The Amero is being looked at as the defacto currency of the North American Community (or Union).

VIDEO


Comment: Wake up, this is part of the New World order system, ie World government the rich are promoting without our consent as a people.

Originally Posted by Robodoon

Amero Agenda Admitted On CNBC

You Tube | April 23, 2007

This video highlights a very serious concern which none of our media is looking into. The Amero is being looked at as the defacto currency of the North American Community (or Union).

VIDEO


Comment: Wake up, this is part of the New World order system, ie World government the rich are promoting without our consent as a people.

I didn't look at the video cause I'm at work. but I'll just assume what it is about.

I'm for it. It's one more step towards Globalization. I like Globalization from an economic view point.

Damn it Robodoon, I was just getting ready to post this vid, nyuk nyuk. Well at least someone in the MSM other than Dobbs is taking this seriously.

Originally Posted by Robodoon

Amero Agenda Admitted On CNBC

You Tube | April 23, 2007

This video highlights a very serious concern which none of our media is looking into. The Amero is being looked at as the defacto currency of the North American Community (or Union).

VIDEO


Comment: Wake up, this is part of the New World order system, ie World government the rich are promoting without our consent as a people.

Hey Robodoon Im part of the New World order. Im a secret agent thats been tracking you through the internet and I found you. You must be silenced, because noone must know the truth.



Seriously dude, talk about something else. No one gives a shit about the New World Order.

Originally Posted by TenGig

I didn't look at the video cause I'm at work. but I'll just assume what it is about.

I'm for it. It's one more step towards Globalization. I like Globalization from an economic view point.

So you think that an 85 billion dollar trade deficit with Mexico and 65 billion dollar trade deficits with Canada, and hundreds of billions of dollars worth of trade deficits with china are a good thing. You must have plenty of money in the markets, you better hope you do!

Originally Posted by TenGig

I didn't look at the video cause I'm at work. but I'll just assume what it is about.

I'm for it. It's one more step towards Globalization. I like Globalization from an economic view point.

Globalization is only for the Rich, it makes slaves out of the rest of us.

So your infavor of your children living an a controlled soviet style world?
I must say thats pretty sad.

Originally Posted by michaelr

So you think that an 85 billion dollar trade deficit with Mexico and 65 billion dollar trade deficits with Canada, and hundreds of billions of dollars worth of trade deficits with china are a good thing. You must have plenty of money in the markets, you better hope you do!

Well I guess I don't know as much as you on the subject. But I'll try anyways...

I don't think trade deficit in the long run is a good thing, its fine in short burst to invest in things you may not be able to without help but it has to go each way (like taking a loan to buy a house. after its paid off, you may go and invest money which is lent to others for similar investments). The way I see long term trade deficit is a country is living better then it should.

The best way to prevent trade deficit is to stop trading with other countries, become more of a sustainable state. Force everyone to buy domestic cars, don't allow foreign investors, ect... I don't see this as a good thing. It's better to trade with other countries. Certain countries are better at producing things then others. So if they're more efficient then you at building one thing, you may want to buy that from them and sell them something you are more efficient at.

Now what I just said s happening everywhere on our planet. Do you make the bread you eat? Grow all the vegetables and fruit you eat? How about clothes? Your TV? Your Microwave? Your car? Of course you didn't make all of those. No one could do all that themselfs. that's why you specialize in one area and trade with others. But what do you use to trade? Money! US dollar is a unified symbol of trade that all your states and people within it use. The Amero and the Euro is the same exact basic idea of your dollar but on a larger scale.

People like your self obvisosly don't like the Idea because it may bring on a period of low economic growth within richer countries. But in the long run the whole world will become richer becasue of it.

And really, if you don't like the idea of Globalization and trading with others. Maybe you should rethink your life. start living in a cave becasue I doubt you built the house you live in. You probably bought it with Currency, which means you traded with others. Which means you live upon the basic theory of globalization.

Now I'm a bit confused by this statement. When you say Soviet you mean Communist right?

Originally Posted by Robodoon

Globalization is only for the Rich, it makes slaves out of the rest of us.

So your infavor of your children living an a controlled soviet style world?
I must say thats pretty sad.

So you say it extends the gap between the rich and poor? But at the same time in a Communist setting where the state/people own everything and are forced to make the same amount regardless if they are more productive?

Communist countries are generally more for the idea of not trading at all. they only do it when they truely need to. thats the opposite of Globalization.

Seriously, in a world of globalization, there is less control over the market. This means it is a true free market. Pure Capitalism for the whole Planet.

Maybe since I didn't watch the movie i don't see the down sides you see. I'm sorry I can't watch it.

Originally Posted by TenGig

Well I guess I don't know as much as you on the subject. But I'll try anyways...

I don't think trade deficit in the long run is a good thing, its fine in short burst to invest in things you may not be able to without help but it has to go each way (like taking a loan to buy a house. after its paid off, you may go and invest money which is lent to others for similar investments). The way I see long term trade deficit is a country is living better then it should.

The best way to prevent trade deficit is to stop trading with other countries, become more of a sustainable state. Force everyone to buy domestic cars, don't allow foreign investors, ect... I don't see this as a good thing. It's better to trade with other countries. Certain countries are better at producing things then others. So if they're more efficient then you at building one thing, you may want to buy that from them and sell them something you are more efficient at.

Now what I just said s happening everywhere on our planet. Do you make the bread you eat? Grow all the vegetables and fruit you eat? How about clothes? Your TV? Your Microwave? Your car? Of course you didn't make all of those. No one could do all that themselfs. that's why you specialize in one area and trade with others. But what do you use to trade? Money! US dollar is a unified symbol of trade that all your states and people within it use. The Amero and the Euro is the same exact basic idea of your dollar but on a larger scale.

People like your self obvisosly don't like the Idea because it may bring on a period of low economic growth within richer countries. But in the long run the whole world will become richer becasue of it.

And really, if you don't like the idea of Globalization and trading with others. Maybe you should rethink your life. start living in a cave becasue I doubt you built the house you live in. You probably bought it with Currency, which means you traded with others. Which means you live upon the basic theory of globalization.

I am a carpenter, so I have built many homes. Only the top few percent of the nation stand to gain from globalization. Yes it would allow countries to be on a more level playing field economical, but at what price? Do you think that the wages in third world nations could ever match ours? If that were the case, they would not offshore jobs. Instead we loose good paying jobs here and are forced to work for Wal-Mart types selling Chinese junk. We used to produce our goods and food for the world right here in the good ol USA, hell now we dint even make dog food. I have many friends who used to work for Boeing, now they work where they can, usually in the service industry. I have been in construction for nearly all my life, now I have to compete with illegals for a job. General Motors is taken a back seat to Toyota, Wal-Mart is the nations largest employer. Prices keep going up, wages go down, and you bet I blame the agenda of the globalist.
The Amero is going to put the Mexican, Canadian, and American economies on a real level playing field, hang on to your hat.

Originally Posted by michaelr

I am a carpenter, so I have built many homes.

But I hope you still see my point anyways. You didn't make the tools you use and you didn't cut the tree down for the wood you use.

Originally Posted by michaelr

Only the top few percent of the nation stand to gain from globalization. Yes it would allow countries to be on a more level playing field economical, but at what price? Do you think that the wages in third world nations could ever match ours? If that were the case, they would not offshore jobs.

Of course they can match your wages. Of course it isn't going to happen tomorrow but gradually. If you don't think it's possible how the hell did america get to it's level of wealth? USA was started with all the wealth you have now. You want to know one of the reasons you got to the point you are now? by trading more with other people and having each person specialize in one area. That method is very efficient. Efficiency = Wealth.

Originally Posted by michaelr

I have been in construction for nearly all my life, now I have to compete with illegals for a job.

Wow, lets bring the subject of illegals up. Of course it's a bad thing to saturate the workforce with a bunch more people. Your wages are created in the same economic structure Supply and Demand. If you raise supply and demand stays the same, price goes down. Now what are you going to do to stop this? Put a 40ft wall across the border and forget about it? One reason people want to globalize is to fix the problem once and for all. If Mexicans had decent jobs they wouldn't jump the border.

Originally Posted by michaelr

General Motors is taken a back seat to Toyota.

Here's a funny story to explain why America's Efficient has gotten off track

Japanese company (Toyota) and an American company (General Motors) decided to have a canoe race on the Missouri River. Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak performance before the race.

On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile.

The Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate the reason for the crushing defeat. A management team made up of senior management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action. Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1 person steering, while the American team had 8 people steering and 1 person rowing.

Feeling a deeper study was in order, American management hired a consulting company and paid them a large amount of money for a second opinion. They advised, of course, that too many people were steering the boat, while not enough people were rowing.

Not sure of how to utilize that information, but wanting to prevent another loss to the Japanese, the rowing team's management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering supervisors, 3 area steering superintendents and 1 assistant superintendent steering manager.

They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 1 person rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder. It was called the "Rowing Team Quality First Program", with meetings, dinners and free pens for the rower. There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes and other equipment, extra vacation days for practices and bonuses.

The next year the Japanese won by two miles.

Humiliated, the American management laid off the rower for poor performance, halted development of a new canoe, sold the paddles, and canceled all capital investments for new equipment. The money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses and the next year's racing team was out-sourced to India.



USA's economy won't survive unless you can figure out what specifically you are good at making (better than others). If you can't figure it out; Close your borders and become communist. Life was never meant to be easy.