I'm not sure how experienced many of you are with macroeconomics; but let's see!
This is in response to:
I assume most will disagree with this statement, but to help my point:
If taxes were decreased by 10% for each bracket (so that someone paying 25% now paid 22.5%); the CBO estimates that the budget would suffer from: (in billions)
This means that only considering the tax cuts, their estimated effect on the economy, production, and so on; the first FIVE years would see a drop of 466 billion, the second FIVE years would see a drop of 775 billion, and overall, that'd be -1.241 trillion over 10 years.Conventional Estimate [-466 -775; -1,241]
This now takes into account that the lost revenue were borrowed (not at current rates of borrowing, this study is almost 5 years old).Additional Debt Service on Conventional Estimate [-56 -261 -317]
The first FIVE years would see 56 billion going towards debt interest, the second FIVE costing 261 billion; for a total of -317 billion over 10 years.
For a total, that'd give us -1.557 trillion dollars over 10 years for a 10% decrease in tax rates.Total [-522 -1,035 -1,557]
For other indicators:
Impact on Real GNP of a Deficit-Financed 10 Percent Cut in Federal Income Tax Rates; most options and scenarios put economic growth, because of the tax cuts, at less than 1%.
This study is one of the more comprehensive in regard to American public policy on tax cuts; takes into account capital flow, working place results, and so on. It's also non-partisan; unlike almost every other 'study'.
Source: CBO



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks