User Tag List

Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 103
  1. #1
    Old Sport Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    West Egg
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

    Taxation and Revenue

    I'm not sure how experienced many of you are with macroeconomics; but let's see!

    This is in response to:

    Quote Originally Posted by Oldschool View Post
    We've estaablished that tax cuts increase federal revenues. thanks.
    I assume most will disagree with this statement, but to help my point:

    If taxes were decreased by 10% for each bracket (so that someone paying 25% now paid 22.5%); the CBO estimates that the budget would suffer from: (in billions)

    Conventional Estimate [-466 -775; -1,241]
    This means that only considering the tax cuts, their estimated effect on the economy, production, and so on; the first FIVE years would see a drop of 466 billion, the second FIVE years would see a drop of 775 billion, and overall, that'd be -1.241 trillion over 10 years.

    Additional Debt Service on Conventional Estimate [-56 -261 -317]
    This now takes into account that the lost revenue were borrowed (not at current rates of borrowing, this study is almost 5 years old).

    The first FIVE years would see 56 billion going towards debt interest, the second FIVE costing 261 billion; for a total of -317 billion over 10 years.

    Total [-522 -1,035 -1,557]
    For a total, that'd give us -1.557 trillion dollars over 10 years for a 10% decrease in tax rates.

    For other indicators:

    Impact on Real GNP of a Deficit-Financed 10 Percent Cut in Federal Income Tax Rates; most options and scenarios put economic growth, because of the tax cuts, at less than 1%.

    This study is one of the more comprehensive in regard to American public policy on tax cuts; takes into account capital flow, working place results, and so on. It's also non-partisan; unlike almost every other 'study'.

    Source: CBO

  2. #2
    PeeK A Boo Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    FEMA REGION IV
    Posts
    6,728
    Thanks
    1,699
    Thanked 1,057 Times in 789 Posts
    That seems to be about right. It is pointless to initiated tax cuts through deficit spending. We must regain sovereignty over our money before any reasonable approach to curing what ails this economy.

    Simply put, we do not produce enough, spend to much at the consumer and government levels and save virtually nothing. I know common wisdom is that consumer spending is what drives this economy but that is because we have a debt based system. The best system to have is just the opposite and that is to have a production based economy. Even though those in power would have you believe inflation is under control, it is not. If you truly want to control inflation we need sovereign currency.

  3. #3
    I'm big in Japan. Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    14,128
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 1,831 Times in 1,309 Posts
    Well then, let's just increase tax rates to 100% and watch the money roll in.
    "The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." - Albert Camus

  4. #4
    Old Sport Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    West Egg
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Macduff View Post
    Well then, let's just increase tax rates to 100% and watch the money roll in.
    I see you're not familiar with the Taxable Income Elasticity principle or the Laffer Curve model of taxation. Here's an example:


  5. #5
    I'm big in Japan. Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    14,128
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 1,831 Times in 1,309 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jardines View Post
    I see you're not familiar with the Taxable Income Elasticity principle or the Laffer Curve model of taxation. Here's an example:

    So there is a point where lower tax rates will bring in higher revenues?
    "The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." - Albert Camus

  6. #6
    Old Sport Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    West Egg
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Macduff View Post
    So there is a point where lower tax rates will bring in higher revenues?
    If you're past the optimal rate, yes.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,481
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jardines View Post
    If you're past the optimal rate, yes.
    And where on that curve are we currently, in your opinion?

  8. #8
    I'm big in Japan. Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    14,128
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 1,831 Times in 1,309 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jardines View Post
    If you're past the optimal rate, yes.
    So tax cuts can increase revenues. Glad we got that settled then. It's just a matter of figuring out where we are on the curve.
    "The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." - Albert Camus

  9. #9
    Old Sport Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    West Egg
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GrumpyOM View Post
    And where on that curve are we currently, in your opinion?
    My opinion, along with most economists, would be that America is currently far to the left; as tax cuts have had negative impacts on revenue and since tax receipts as a percentage of GDP are the lowest in over 50 years.

    Source: TPC; Individual and total tax receipts as a percentage of GDP haven't been as low as they are now since about 1950; for a short while— and since 1940 for more than a year or two.

    These low taxation rates are unsustainable.

  10. #10
    A "Fertilized Egg" Contra Champion Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4,407
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 517 Times in 403 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jardines View Post
    These low taxation rates are unsustainable.
    Not true.

    We can, and should, cut costs until current rates lead to a large surplus.


 
Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Hey Congress, Want $400 Billion in New Annual Revenue?
    By Cicero in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19th June 2011, 07:29 AM
  2. Federal aid is top revenue for states
    By Stinger in forum Economy & Business
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 9th May 2009, 04:36 PM
  3. How much Ad revenue does PH/Ballot.com make?
    By Buddha86 in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 13th June 2008, 02:00 AM
  4. Taxation
    By Burning Giraffe in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 29th May 2008, 01:10 AM
  5. Tax Revenue Analysis Shows Billions in Untapped Online Gambling Revenue.
    By JeffreyS in forum General Political Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31st January 2008, 02:58 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2