Thread: Kerrey Insults Troops Yet Again

opinions and baseless claims

If that's what you want to call it, be my guest.

Well in that case, it doesn't matter if Kerry threw himself onto a friendly grenade while he was in Vietnam. Well in that case, it doesn't matter if Kerry threw himself onto a friendly grenade while he was in Vietnam. At least he wasn't lazing about snorting coke, boozing it up and ruining about ten of daddie's companies. He volunteered and did his time. He volunteered and did his time.

He made a mockery of the complete definition of his oath to protect and serve. He doesn't need his daddy's companies, he's got one rich ex and one heiress bride to mooch off of.

Originally Posted by Dr. Perkis

Yes, he has really been mopping the floor with me with his opinions and baseless claims. Just like the right mopped the floor with the elections this time?



Well in that case, it doesn't matter if Kerry threw himself onto a friendly grenade while he was in Vietnam. At least he wasn't lazing about snorting coke, boozing it up and ruining about ten of daddie's companies. He volunteered and did his time.

It's amazing how the non sequiturs fly when the losers start striking out blindly.

Okay, anyone paying any attention will note that the second midterm election of a two term president typically results in large losses in the House and Senate from the president's party. By historical standards, this last election was actually less extreme than many others.

Kerry didn't throw himself on a grenade he'd been playing with, that was Kerrey. Kerry is the gigolo, the guy that scratched himself with a piece of shrapnel to get a Purple Heart and who got his Silver Star for shooting an unarmed boy after abandoning his command.

Got any real evidence to support that coke story about Bush, or is it on a par with the low IQ nonsense published by the Lovenstein Foundation in 2000?

Originally Posted by Freedom for All

It's amazing how the non sequiturs fly when the losers start striking out blindly.

Actually it would help if you understood what a non sequitur was, which this is not.

Originally Posted by Freedom for All

Okay, anyone paying any attention will note that the second midterm election of a two term president typically results in large losses in the House and Senate from the president's party. By historical standards, this last election was actually less extreme than many others.

History sometimes does follow trends, however one cannot use it to predict how you imply. Are you saying that if the Republicans had not been following a disastrous policy that they still would not have gotten pounded? This is an example of a non sequitur, it does not make a great deal of sense. Why even vote, if this is the case, or even campaign? The elections have already been decided by historical trends? A most amusing notion.

Originally Posted by Freedom for All

Kerry didn't throw himself on a grenade he'd been playing with, that was Kerrey. Kerry is the gigolo, the guy that scratched himself with a piece of shrapnel to get a Purple Heart and who got his Silver Star for shooting an unarmed boy after abandoning his command.

This shameful propaganda cooked up by the Rovian zombies to discredit a man that served his country in wartime is a travesty. If you had actually been in the military, as you claim to have been, then you would think so as well. There is no proof for any of this crap, it is all slime and innuendo.

Originally Posted by Freedom for All

Got any real evidence to support that coke story about Bush, or is it on a par with the low IQ nonsense published by the Lovenstein Foundation in 2000?

"Bush has essentially admitted that he used cocaine in his Clintonesque, carefully worded partial denials. He won't deny using cocaine or marijuana, though under persistent questioning he said that he hadn't used cocaine in the last 7 years. Most newspapers report that he denies using cocaine since 1974, but that's not exactly true."

George W. Bush, Jr. - The Dark Side

Bush, himself has admitted to cocaine use and heavy drinking in the past. It is a matter of public record that he received community service for drug related issues. That's proof enough to me, or is he lying about it?
But its okay now, since he found God and the love of a good woman. I remember him saying that in the first election.

Originally Posted by Feslin

If that's what you want to call it, be my guest.

When you make unsupported claims, that is not what I call it. That's what they are.

Originally Posted by Dr. Perkis

Bush, himself has admitted to cocaine use and heavy drinking in the past. It is a matter of public record that he received community service for drug related issues. That's proof enough to me, or is he lying about it?

Okay. You're saying that since he says he didn't do it, it means he did it.

Wouldn't it have been easier for you to type "No. I'm only repeating Internet myths and Democrat talking points because I know it's a lie."?

So, based on Dr. Perkis's "logic," Bill Clinton must still be screwing interns and lying under oath, after all that is a matter of public record and he was impeached for it. Good to know.

Originally Posted by Dr. Perkis

Actually it would help if you understood what a non sequitur was, which this is not.

Yes, it would help if you stop putting them in your responses, wouldn't it?





History sometimes does follow trends, however one cannot use it to predict how you imply. Are you saying that if the Republicans had not been following a disastrous policy that they still would not have gotten pounded? This is an example of a non sequitur, it does not make a great deal of sense. Why even vote, if this is the case, or even campaign? The elections have already been decided by historical trends? A most amusing notion.

[qoute]Originally Posted by Freedom for All
Kerry didn't throw himself on a grenade he'd been playing with, that was Kerrey. Kerry is the gigolo, the guy that scratched himself with a piece of shrapnel to get a Purple Heart and who got his Silver Star for shooting an unarmed boy after abandoning his command.[/quote]

This shameful propaganda cooked up by the Rovian zombies to discredit a man that served his country in wartime is a travesty. If you had actually been in the military, as you claim to have been, then you would think so as well. There is no proof for any of this crap, it is all slime and innuendo.

It's not propaganda. KerrEy really did blow his own legs off.

And KerrY really did admit to running his ship aground, abandoning his post, thus leaving his command (and his men) at the mercy of any other rocket launching VC in the area...who now had a fixed target to shoot at, to go running into the jungle to shoot a man who he claimed was armed only with...the single shot rocket launcher he'd used to attack Kerry's boat with.

John Kerry - Unfit for Command - More Fraudulent Medals

Kerry in many ways reminds me of the Bill Murray's company commander in "Stripes", just not as competent.