Thread: USA: Mentally ill convicted

Originally Posted by Feslin

If they kill someone, they lose the right to life. Isn't that how it works? The elderly and sick, on the other hand, haven't done anything wrong enough to be killed.

It is not how it works for me

Originally Posted by Freedom for All

What's wrong with revenge?

This is all about morals.. if you have none, I can't explain that to you

Originally Posted by Maritxu

It is not how it works for me

Well then how DOES it work?

Originally Posted by Feslin

Well then how DOES it work?

It's very simple: Killing is wrong, no matter who does the killing. And I refuse to have my hands covered with blood.

Originally Posted by Maritxu

It's very simple: Killing is wrong, no matter who does the killing. And I refuse to have my hands covered with blood.

So you're an objectivist then?

And here I was thinking you were a leftist...

Originally Posted by Feslin

So you're an objectivist then?

And here I was thinking you were a leftist...

Sorry hon, I gotta learn about what you called me so that I can defend myself,
I'll tell you in a bit

Moral objectivism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Originally Posted by Feslin

Moral objectivism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Let's see.. opposing killing also includes opposing self defence? Because in that case I can't be called an objectivist

Originally Posted by Maritxu

Let's see.. opposing killing also includes opposing self defence? Because in that case I can't be called an objectivist

So it's NOT always wrong to kill then?

Originally Posted by Feslin

So it's NOT always wrong to kill then?

It's not really the same, that's human preservation, survival instint, not revenge.