Thread: No wonder why Israel is censoring all their activities

Israel is accused of using energy weapons. Here's a piece of it.

-----------------------
By now there are countless reports, from hospitals, witnesses, armament experts and journalists that strongly suggest that in the present offensive of Israeli forces against Lebanon and Gaza 'new weapons' are being used.

New and strange symptoms are reported amongst the wounded and the dead.

Bodies with dead tissues and no apparent wounds; 'shrunken' corpses; civilians with heavy damage to lower limbs that require amputation, which is nevertheless followed by unstoppable necrosis and death; descriptions of extensive internal wounds with no trace of shrapnel, corpses blackened but not burnt, and others heavily wounded that did not bleed.
-----------------------


http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...articleId=2932

Is this the way innocent victims are supposed to act?

The article is written by a Canadian who is not in Lebanon, and has no refference to any reports making these claims. In fact, the article does not even claim that anyone is making any such complaints or comments anywhere. I would need verification from a witness of these events in Lebanon or someone who is trying to treat these situations in a medical center there.

If these things are happening, and I have found no evidence that they are, I will have an interview done with someone who can tell what they are seeing and what is happening first hand and get it on the air.

..........and half the articles presented here aren't from Lebenon or Israel. They are written by reporters (actually they are repeaters. they REPEAT what our current regime says. The don't REPORT) who are sitting in coushy chairs in America. So what's to say that my link isn't as credible as half the links posted here? But, you're point is taken and I will look for a follow up.

Just to let ya'll know. I know several Lebenese in my neighborhood. One actually fought in the Lebenese Army during the 80's who was there when the shit hit the fan and had to escape not only the Israeli bombardment, he had to avoid the Syrian Army who wants his ass too. Doesn't make me a know it all on the subject, but I hear real unreported accounts all the time. Biased stories? Sure, but isn't our news EXTREMELY biased too?

I am a news writer. I also strongly believe Isreal is in the wrong. Is it biased to report all sides of the story? I think not. And I have friends on both sides of this outrageous war. Can I say it's outrageous in a news story? No - because that is opinion. We are only alowed to report facts unless doing an opinion piece.

I am a news writer. I also strongly believe Isreal is in the wrong. Is it biased to report all sides of the story? I think not. And I have friends on both sides of this outrageous war. Can I say it's outrageous in a news story? No - because that is opinion. We are only alowed to report facts unless doing an opinion piece.

But you quoted in another forum that America has a free media David. Biased news reports do not make a "free media". As far as these "Energy Weapons", it looks to me like the U.S. is playing with their new toys. Joy to the world! ~Inkster

Inky, I have not seen any biased news reports yet, and I get hundreds of reports from the news sources in those areas every day. I have seen reports of what officials on both sides say, and reports of the casalites and attacks on all sides, and reports of what witnesses and victims are saying, as well as leaders of all the organizations and governments involved, but all have stuck to information available at the moment from whoever they were interviewing or getting facts from at the moment.

I have seen biased OPINION reports, but those are not considered news. Could you show me some of the news reports you refer to?

I'm sure you see both sides of the news David, but what reports are printed or broadcast is a different story. That's what I'm referring to as "Free Media" or lack of I should say... ~Inkster

We broadcast both sides. So does our competition. Again, can you point me to a news station or paper that does not?

David
What do you see as the complicity of the UN in this war? They obviously did not disarm the Hezbo's as required...In fact they, by my informed knowledge, did nothing but "bunker down" in southern Lebanon. While it is true that they did not have the resources to disarm the terrorists, the fact the Annan had the gall to blame the war on Israel after his obvious failure goes against reason.

How should Israel have acted, in your opinion when raiders, from Lebanon killed and captured Israeli soldiers on duty at their assigned posts in Israel..as well as , do not forget, killing a young father and his child?

If for instance Mexican bandits did this to American troops stationed on the border would you blame America as well for going after them in force?

Consider the fact that there were only two things Israel could have done...Nothing or what they have done. An exchange of prisioners is out of the question when those sought are acknowledged killers and those captured were legitimate soldiers...Attempts to put these to forces on the same moral plane are unreasonable.

As an aside I , as you can see, am new to this forum and like the format so far....one thing though.... is your redesign going to include a spell checker? I have dealt with a moderate dyslexia my whole life and the dictionaries I have worn out would fill your study :lol:

We broadcast both sides. So does our competition. Again, can you point me to a news station or paper that does not?

How about Television? President Bush' addresses to the Nation would be a good start! ~Inkster