Thread: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov

Part 1

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZzwyPRgY9o[/media]







Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZzwyPRgY9o

Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U4pwJzK8Dk

Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xa8cErtJhY

Part 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZFoLRkg-K0

Part 5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddl4qsOc8po

Part 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRzPT8pZUjo

Part 7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKJksB3oTPA

Part 8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyF6QgE3ufc

Part 9

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3VqyUXEAPA

Part 10

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pt_-qBVkTJk

Part 11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5DeeHCCROg

Part 12

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-TbpezpY0c

Part 13

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhgS17l-PZo

Part 14

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXk1-Ut7_ks

Part 15

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMXdWK3KTGY

Part 16

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYf5-iw6vok

Part 17

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGHxFXB2Vew

Part 18

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bto0KbFtqKs

Part 19

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17H6sp-FyiA

Part 20

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MW9CsWi2aDk

Part 21

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TYP8JHGRsE

Part 22

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x77s9lxt7t0

Part 23

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgClEUxLXRk

Part 24

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQDHAN3aQAg

Part 25

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5q64FW0uiI

Part 26

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0Wbh32W2uc





http://www.nuclear-demolition-wikipedia.com





http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin...gi?read=170354





WAS THE UNITED NATIONS BUILDING BUILT WITH A NUCLEAR BOMB IN ITS FOUNDATION?



Posted By: Rayelan <Send E-Mail>

Date: Saturday, 3-Apr-2010 21:02:51

The following arrived from a friend:



Rayelan, do you remember years ago you mentioned that Gunther told you that a nuclear device was planted underneath the United Nations for its eventual demolition. That it was built into the structure.



Listen to this Russian guy, because he corroborates what Gunther told you, but in a different way. He says large structures like the World Trade Center, that the builders knew how to build them, but not how to take them down. So it became standard policy agreed with a demolition company in the U.S. to construct into the foundation of these large buildings nuclear devices which would be triggered to demolition these large buildings at a future date. So you can bet the lavish buildings being built in Dubai have nuclear devices built into their foundation.



The youtube video is here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZFoLRkg-K0





Researchers claim 9/11 sicknesses in the U.S. related to environmental radiation contamination



Two days after 9/11, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed that the Pentagon crash site rubble was radioactive and that the probable contaminant was Depleted Uranium (DU)."





http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/new...amination.html

I haven&#39;t watched all those videos yet but I think that those people who put forth the no-plane theory, etc are governnment disinfo agents trying to cause disruption in the 9/11 truth movement. If there are some wacko theories out there that make the official version look logical by comparison, fewer people will join the truth movement.

http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums...pic.php?t=1222



This article deals with that subject.

http://pseudonautics.blogspot.com/20...echniques.html

(excerpt)

--------------------------------------------------------------

The best way to harm a cause is to defend it using wrong arguments.

This is why, every time there is a government conspiracy, you have a load of kooks making ridiculous claims to discredit critics by association.

Concerning 911, you have pod people, holograms, WTC nuclear devices, and directed energy weapons from space.

--------------------------------------------------------------



So does this video.

http://skoolpool.com/watch?v=HYedTmaHt1A

(7:22 and 9:32 time marks)

9/11 definitely was an inside job. Here&#39;s some stuff I&#39;ve found.



Look at this picture of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.

http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg



It&#39;s too pointed to be the nose of a 757.

http://www.caverca.com/Images/Boeing...0TACV%2001.jpg



The photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon was taken with a fish-eye lens which causes some distortion but the rest of the objects in the picture are not distorted to the same degree as the nose of a 757 would have to be to have that shape. The shadow line is visible under the nose and it&#39;s consistent with the shadow of the Pentagon.



The picture is consistent with these analyses.

http://www.physics911.net/missingwings

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/A...March2006.html



Also, we know that the Pentagon is about 75 feet high and that a 757 is about 150 feet long. If we look at the section of the Pentagon where the plane hit in the picture at the top of this page...

http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm



...and compare it with the space behind the box where the aircraft is, we can see that a 757 couldn&#39;t fit in that space without the nose protruding out front. The plane in the space behind the box is much too short to be a 757.



A 757 would look like this.

http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com...ntacamscam.jpg



This analysis makes it pretty clear that a 757 wouldn&#39;t fit behind the box.

http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm



Also, if you look at the fourth picture from the top on this page, you&#39;ll see the hole made by the craft.

http://www.physics911.net/missingwings



There would have been some damage from the wings of a 757. Look at the damage caused by the 767 on the side of the tower.

http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d...37c495d8834-pi



There&#39;s quite a difference.



Here&#39;s a blown up photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.

http://www.sott.net/signs/editorials...otInvolved.php

(excerpt)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is it more clear now? Can you see Flight 77 in all its glory? All we can see is an amorphous white blob that looks more like a car than the nose cone of any aircraft. Obviously the images are too grainy to be of any use to anyone. At this point then, the most we can say is that an amorphous white blob with definite Islamic terrorists leanings hit the Pentagon on 9/11.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I agree with the person who wrote that it doesn&#39;t prove that a 757 hit the Pentagon but I disagree with his saying the photo isn&#39;t of any use to anyone. If we look at the high-resolution picture, it&#39;s obviously the nose of a fighter-type craft.

http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg



Look at the second picture from the top on this page.

http://insider-outsider.blogspot.com...eo-should.html



I know the scale is wrong and the 757 is too big but it gives us an idea of what we should have seen in the video released by the government considering all the cameras that surround the Pentagon.

At the 3:55 time mark of this video it&#39;s pointed out that there were lots of cameras at the Pentagon.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNsSn6D3CP4



They must have footage of the craft hitting the Pentagon. They just don&#39;t want us to see it because we&#39;ll know it wasn&#39;t a 757.



These three articles are important.

http://www.physics911.net/omholt

http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06...-pentagon.html

http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson

(excerpt)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



There are some good documentaries in this link.

http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm



Be sure to watch "9/11 Mysteries" and "Painful Deceptions".



This stuff below is good too. The first two deal with the "Thermite" issue which is important.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...07671184881047

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSh5o6ca8FM

http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9t_i08d1xc

http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06...-pentagon.html



In this clip the representative from NIST is playing dumb about the pools of molten steel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAS4TIYF68A



Here&#39;s a 6 part video about group of arquitects that think 9/11 was in inside job.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhPlV99AVQE



They pulled off the 9/11 attack so they would have a pretext to invade the Middle East to get control of the oil there. This is an old story.



http://video.google.es/videosearch?q=terror+storm#

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO301A.html

http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ...atingenemy.htm



Here&#39;s some stuff about the history of US and British meddling in the Middle East.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...40865741878159

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...000history.htm

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...itishindex.htm

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/irqindx.htm

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...niesiniraq.htm

http://www.war-times.org/pdf/Oil%20leaflet.pdf

http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/i...protection.htm



These two are important.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...38213439292490

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jle47NiSNSQ



Here&#39;s some more stuff.

http://killtown.911review.org/911links.html#forums



http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/claim.html

http://killtown.blogspot.com/2005/11...n-was-hit.html

http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/theories.html#5

http://www.netctr.com/media.html

http://www.netctr.com/911exposed.html

Hi MichaelR I&#39;m not to sure myself about this nuke thing it just seems a bit to much using them in downtown NY, but I thought I better share the info. I heard that that the thermite idea had been peer reviewed as well which makes it more credible atm.