Thread: The central banks start every major war...

or at the very least loan to both sides. The civil war, the war of 1812, WWI WWII and you know what even Iraq. They are the NWO.
The Modern History Project

For WWI go to 2:15 in the following video.

For our civil war go to 1:15 For the full story watch the entire video.

[youtube]k3VUsNPTAV0[/youtube]

thx for making this thread, ready to lose?

You are making a pretty big claim, because there is a difference from a banking organization funding different people on a side of a war, and actualy starting the war. I don't believe it isn't a banker's job to deny a country money if they don't like what it is being used for.

I have looked at that earler video and as I said, in that thread, there is no evidence for the "central banker conspiracy" and there is huge flaws in the video's logic.

I have explained why the Cvil War one makes no sense, and the flaws in its logic, so if you are right there then we will move on to the other wars. Sorry, but it is kind of painful (in an annoyed way) to watch too much of that video at once.

Firstly,

The video says that it was the tariff that caused the Civil War (which isn't true to begin with) but even if that was true, then it still wouldn't explain HOW the central bankers started the war. Can you explain that jump?

This brings to mind two of my favorite Ferengi
Rules of Acquisition:

34. War is good for business.
35. Peace is good for business.


(It is said that they are easy to confuse.)

Originally Posted by Nerv14

I have explained why the Cvil War one makes no sense, and the flaws in its logic, so if you are right there then we will move on to the other wars. Sorry, but it is kind of painful (in an annoyed way) to watch too much of that video at once.

Firstly,

The video says that it was the tariff that caused the Civil War (which isn't true to begin with) but even if that was true, then it still wouldn't explain HOW the central bankers started the war. Can you explain that jump?

The tariffs were in place, it drove the southern states broke, this added in the start of the war. Briton through the central banks are responsible. They financed British industry, they were pumping cheep goods into this country.

The 1828 tariff was part of a series of tariffs that began after the War of 1812 and the Napoleonic Wars, when the blockade of Europe led British manufacturers to offer goods in America at prices American manufacturers often could not match. The first protective tariff was passed by Congress in 1816, with tariff rates increased in 1824. Southern states were opposed to the newer protectionist tariffs, but Western agricultural states favored them as well as New England's industry.

Source......

The war started basically as a trade war, the bank wanted in and a divided nation was their only option.

2:30 for WWII, this should shock the socks off ya!!!

Wow you can learn something every day. This is your international money...

Why was the SDR created and what is it used for today?

Exchange rates.....

Originally Posted by michaelr

The tariffs were in place, it drove the southern states broke, this added in the start of the war. Briton through the central banks are responsible. They financed British industry, they were pumping cheep goods into this country.


Source......

The war started basically as a trade war, the bank wanted in and a divided nation was their only option.

Just because Britain was financed by central bankers you can't at all assume that the reason was to harm the south by a tariff. (Is that your argument, I wasn't sure completely sure anyway.)

How would you not know that Britain just got funding for its industries because of the profits that the bankers would obtain? When there is an investment, the reason, without any other facts to say otherwise, is for the company to grow and the investor to make money.

This is like global warming, there is the theory and the course of events, but nothing to prove that the theory is true and the connection between everything.


You should look at the Civil War thread anyway because the tariff was not the main reason for the South to suceed from the North. I showed how right before the Civil War, the tariff was at its lowest level in around 30 years, so there was no reason for the South to start its rebellion if the tariff was the major issue. How would you explain that?

The 1870's was also a very important time because the senate balance had just been broken between the North and the South, so there was less political power protecting slaves.

Someone also had tried to have a slave rebellion right before the Civil War, and he was praised in many areas in the North, which inflamed the South. (but that is a more minor issue)

Originally Posted by Nerv14

Just because Britain was financed by central bankers you can't at all assume that the reason was to harm the south by a tariff. (Is that your argument, I wasn't sure completely sure anyway.)

How would you not know that Britain just got funding for its industries because of the profits that the bankers would obtain? When there is an investment, the reason, without any other facts to say otherwise, is for the company to grow and the investor to make money.

This is like global warming, there is the theory and the course of events, but nothing to prove that the theory is true and the connection between everything.


You should look at the Civil War thread anyway because the tariff was not the main reason for the South to suceed from the North. I showed how right before the Civil War, the tariff was at its lowest level in around 30 years, so there was no reason for the South to start its rebellion if the tariff was the major issue. How would you explain that?

The 1870's was also a very important time because the senate balance had just been broken between the North and the South, so there was less political power protecting slaves.

Someone also had tried to have a slave rebellion right before the Civil War, and he was praised in many areas in the North, which inflamed the South. (but that is a more minor issue)

The tariff was not what you were taught, the English knew they could not dump cheap goods into this country forever. The tariff was planned. Then they were going to lend the southern states the money that they needed to fight the north. It took the Russians to back them off. If they would have lent the south money for the war, we would be living in a different country right now and the central bank would have had it's clutches deeply planted in this country about 85 years before it did. The central bank always pays for or starts wars, they thrive on it.

Right now they are collapsing our economy and the economy of the world, they will consolidate everything they can, and thats allot, after all they are going to be the only ones with money.

Look the banks own this country, they own your government, they own your media, you must take what you think you know about certain things with a grain of salt.