Thread: 911 Smoking Gun

Why do people stupidly believe 9/11 was an inside job?

Because its not unfeasible, just highly unlikely.

Because most of them just hate the administration.

Personally, I believe UA93 was shot down, but out of necessity.

Why do people stupidly believe you can fly a jumbo jet into the most highly defended building on Earth (Pentagon) without a military jet taking off in defense even though they had an hours advance warning of said attack.

9/11 is so obviously an inside job the whole world already knows.

Originally Posted by abaddon

Why do people stupidly believe you can fly a jumbo jet into the most highly defended building on Earth (Pentagon) without a military jet taking off in defense even though they had an hours advance warning of said attack.

9/11 is so obviously an inside job the whole world already knows.

Question: If the government wanted to attack itself, why would they use a plot that was complicated and could potentially give away a lot of evidence?

Originally Posted by Conservative15

Question: If the government wanted to attack itself, why would they use a plot that was complicated and could potentially give away a lot of evidence?

The evidence is all there if you'd ever open your fucking mind up.

Originally Posted by Inkslinger

The evidence is all there if you'd ever open your fucking mind up.

I have looked at all the evidence with an open mind. Everything gets debunked.

Can you answer my question?

Your name is Conservative15, and you talk of having an open mind?
L.
M.
F.
A.
O.

Originally Posted by PLaid_Dragon1873

Your name is Conservative15, and you talk of having an open mind?
L.
M.
F.
A.
O.

'Nuff said 'bout Dat!

The reason is pretty obvious. There is loads of speculation that points to it being an inside job.

There is a clear white path EXACTLY where the jet landed on the Pentagon's lawn, visible 1 week before the accident.

If a fucking commercial jet supposedly crashed into the side of the Pentagon, why are there no marks or damage from where the tail and wings SHOULD have hit the walls, just a big fucking hole?

The only released footage of the "jet" hitting the Pentagon, doesn't even show a jet. It shows the wall of the Pentagon, and then just a few frames of a ball of fire exploding.

The windows on the Pentagon's upper floors are intact, yet a "jet" hit the wall. Shouldn't the windows be busted? Also, the cable spools are untouched.

Now, if you focus on the Towers:

A building in Chicago was hit by a jet in the...50's I believe. It burned for over 30 hours straight, and did not collapse. The Twin Towers were hit by jets, and collapsed in less than 5 minutes.

Watch the videos of the Towers just before they collapse. You can see small flashes, believed to be demolishon bombs going off.

Just tons of evidence pointing to it being an inside job. And I didn't wanna go dig this old shit up, but read this(Not my post, I copied it from Offtopicz):

Much confusion has been circulating on the internet in the past few years about some of the occurances that happened on 9-11-2001. The official story states that Flight 93 ran into the ground at 550mph and 99.9% of the aircraft vaporized. Check out the photos from the Flight 93.






Crater close up.


Overhead view of crater.